Search: depreciation | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

141 results for “depreciation”+ Section 198clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai375 Delhi310 Bangalore141 Ahmedabad91 Chennai79 Kolkata60 Jaipur57 Chandigarh56 Pune36 Hyderabad29 Lucknow20 Karnataka15 Raipur14 Surat12 Visakhapatnam11 Indore10 Guwahati5 Rajkot5 SC5 Jodhpur4 Rajasthan3 Cochin3 Nagpur3 Amritsar3 Ranchi3 Telangana2 Cuttack2 Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)112 Section 143(3)83 Addition to Income78 Disallowance50 Deduction43 Section 14840 Section 14A34 Section 9(1)(vi)32 Section 153A31

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2139/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in water tank nature 5 Construction and filling 6,06,198 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 141 · Page 1 of 8

...

ITA 2136/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in water tank nature 5 Construction and filling 6,06,198 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2138/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in water tank nature 5 Construction and filling 6,06,198 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2135/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in water tank nature 5 Construction and filling 6,06,198 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

M/S KARNATAKA EMTA COAL MINES LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2137/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Gudimella V.P. Pavan Kumar &

Section 32(1)(ii)Section 35ESection 37

Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable in water tank nature 5 Construction and filling 6,06,198 Section 35E(3)(iii) – depreciable

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BANGALORE vs. M/S. VOKKALIGARA SANGHA, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 1336/BANG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Sept 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raoasst. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Circle-1, Bengaluru. … Appellant Vs. M/S.Vokkaligara Sangha, Kr Road, Vv Puram, Bengaluru-560004. … Respondent Pan: Aaatv 3662 K Appellant By : Shri S.Nambirajan, Addl.Cit(Dr) Respondent By : S/Shri L.Bharath & Vishal Dedhia, Ca

For Appellant: Shri S.Nambirajan, Addl.CIT(DR)For Respondent: S/Shri L.Bharath & Vishal Dedhia, CA

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S.GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (HOSPITAL), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 1605/BANG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Jul 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri G.Kamaladhar, Standing CounselFor Respondent: Shri Pranav Krishna, Advocate

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S.GOKULA EDUCATION FOUNDATION (MEDICALL), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 1609/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Jul 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri G.Kamaladhar, Standing CounselFor Respondent: Shri Pranav Krishna, Advocate

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ACIT-(E), CIRCLE-1,, BANGALORE vs. M/S. BHAGWAN MAHAVEER MEMORIAL JAIN TRUST, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1516/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Oct 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Laliet Kumarasst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (E), Circle-1, Bengaluru. … Appellant Vs. Bhagwan Mahaveer Memorial Jain Trust, No.17, Millers Road, Vasanth Nagar, Bengaluru-560 052. … Respondent Pan:Aaatb 0895 L

For Appellant: Shri G.R.Reddy, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Shri Muralidhar, H, Advocate

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28Section 35(1)(iv)

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. SRI. TARALABALU BRUHANMATT, CHITRADURGA

In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed

ITA 893/BANG/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Jul 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Inturi Rama Raoassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri G. Kamalakar, Standing CounselFor Respondent: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, CA

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ITO, BANGALORE vs. SHARDDHA TRUST, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 899/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raoincome-Tax Officer (Exemptions), Ward-3, Bengaluru. … Appellant Vs. Shraddha Trust, No.37/10, Yellappa Chetty Layout, Ulsoor Road, Bengaluru-560042. … Respondent Pan: Aacts 7373J

For Appellant: Shri G.Kamaladhar, Standing Counsel for DepartmentFor Respondent: None

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Page 8 of 16 Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years

ASST.C.I.T., MANGALORE vs. VISHWACHETAN FOUNDATION, HUBLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 957/BANG/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Raothe Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax(Exemption), Circle-1, Mangalore. . Appellant Vs. Vishwachetan Foundation Ibmr, 1St Main, Jaynagar, Opp: Kims, Hubbali. Appellant By : Shri S Nambirajan, Jcit Respondent By : Shri Naginchand Khincha, Ca Date Of Hearing : 17-5-2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 20-5-2016 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S Nambirajan, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Naginchand Khincha, CA

Section 11Section 148Section 28Section 32Section 35(2)(iv)

198 ITR 598/[1993] 70 Taxman 228 (Guj.); v. Bheruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513/106 Taxman 311 (Cal.); ITA No.957/B/15 8 (5) Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities's case (supra) and (6) Market Committee, Pipli case (supra) Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which has already availed the benefit of deduction in computing

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S VIDYANIDHI EDUCATION TRUST, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 1073/BANG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. K. Garodia

For Appellant: Shri. Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Padmameenakshi, JCIT

Section 11(6)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MANGALORE vs. M/S. NORTH WESTERN KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBLI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 165/BANG/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Nov 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Sagar, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Pratibha, Advocate

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MANGALORE vs. M/S. NORTH WESTERN KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBLI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 164/BANG/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Sagar, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Pratibha, Advocate

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MANGALORE vs. M/S. NORTH WESTERN KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBLI

In the result, all the appeals are dismissed

ITA 166/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Nov 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. Vandana Sagar, CIT(DR)For Respondent: Ms. Pratibha, Advocate

Section 11(6)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ITO, BANGALORE vs. STRACEY MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 854/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Apr 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri G.Kamaladhar, Standing Counsel for DepartmentFor Respondent: Shri C.R.Nulvi, CA

Section 11(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 28

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli [(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1, MANGALURU vs. M/S. DR. T. M. A. PAI FOUNDATION, MANIPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 783/BANG/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

For Appellant: Smt. Sheetal Borkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sri Nandini Das, Addl. CIT (DR)

Section 11Section 11(1)(d)Section 15Section 70

198 ITR 598 [Guj.]; (4) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. Bhoruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513 [Cal.]; (5) Commissioner of Income-tax, v. RaoBahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities 135 ITR 485 (Mad.)] (6) Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Market Committee, Pipli[(2011) 238 CTR (P&H) 103 Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BANGALORE vs. M/S.KARNATAKA STATE CRICKET ASSOCIATION, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for asst

ITA 1615/BANG/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Jun 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Vijaypal Rao & Shri Jason P Boazthe Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, (E), Circle – 1, Bangalore. . Appellant Vs. M/S Karnataka State Cricket Association, Chinnaswamy Stadium, Mg Road, Bangalore. . Respondent

For Appellant: Smt. Swapna Das, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma, Advocate

198 ITR 598/[1993] 70 Taxman 228 (Guj.); v. Bheruka Public Welfare Trust [1999] 240 ITR 513/106 Taxman 311 (Cal.); ITA No.1615/B/16 9 (5) Rao Bahadur Calavala Cunnan Chetty Charities's case (supra) and (6) Market Committee, Pipli case (supra) Allowing depreciation in subsequent years, on the capital asset, which has already availed the benefit of deduction in computing

T D POWER LTD,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee's appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2003/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Nov 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Ramadhyani, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. R. Premi, JCIT (D.R)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 32Section 35Section 37Section 40

Section 32(2AB) of the Act of Rs.32,01,83,434 but as per the Form No.3CL dt.14.05.2015 issued by the DSIR, the deduction is restricted to Rs.31,52,30,000. Therefore the assessee claimed that the depreciation on the capital expenditure which was not considered by the DSIR of Rs.49,53,434 has to be allowed. The learned Authorised