BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

156 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai230Delhi171Bangalore156Chennai44Jaipur41Hyderabad23Visakhapatnam19Kolkata19Guwahati16Ahmedabad14Karnataka13Chandigarh9Cochin8Rajkot8Pune7Cuttack6Kerala5Lucknow5Raipur3Calcutta2Indore2Nagpur1Amritsar1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A132Addition to Income93Section 14879Section 143(3)76Section 153C50Depreciation43Disallowance42Section 14739Section 13239Section 11

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

ITA 619/BANG/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh D, Add. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132Section 143Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

depreciation benefit available to the assessee though the cost of land increases and he may sell the land. Therefore R & R expenditure debited in the P & L Account was treated as capital expenditure instead of revenue expenditure as claimed by the assessee and addition was made in the Assessment Order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C

Showing 1–20 of 156 · Page 1 of 8

...
35
Section 132(4)24
Natural Justice16

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

ITA 621/BANG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh D, Add. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132Section 143Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

depreciation benefit available to the assessee though the cost of land increases and he may sell the land. Therefore R & R expenditure debited in the P & L Account was treated as capital expenditure instead of revenue expenditure as claimed by the assessee and addition was made in the Assessment Order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

ITA 620/BANG/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh D, Add. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132Section 143Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

depreciation benefit available to the assessee though the cost of land increases and he may sell the land. Therefore R & R expenditure debited in the P & L Account was treated as capital expenditure instead of revenue expenditure as claimed by the assessee and addition was made in the Assessment Order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C

RAMAMURTHY PRAVEEN CHANDRA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, we have allowed grounds raised by the assessee as per above terms for all the years

ITA 622/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sankar Ganesh D, Add. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 132Section 143Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 250

depreciation benefit available to the assessee though the cost of land increases and he may sell the land. Therefore R & R expenditure debited in the P & L Account was treated as capital expenditure instead of revenue expenditure as claimed by the assessee and addition was made in the Assessment Order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153C

M/S P. SHYAMARAJU & CO.(I) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 979/BANG/2014[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S P. SHYAMARAJU & CO (I) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 978/BANG/2014[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S SHYAMARAJU & CO INDIA PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 944/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S SHYAMARAJU & CO INDIA PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 941/BANG/2014[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S P. SHYAMARAJU & CO.(I) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 984/BANG/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S P. SHYAMARAJU & CO.(I) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 982/BANG/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S SHYAMARAJU & CO INDIA PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 942/BANG/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

P. SHYAMARAJU & CO.(I) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 980/BANG/2014[2003-04]Status: FixedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

ASST.C.I.T., BANGALORE vs. M/S SHYAMARAJU & CO INDIA PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 943/BANG/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Apr 2022AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Sri.V.Chandrashekar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri.Sri.Dilip, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 154Section 292C

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H. M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 68/BANG/2017[2007 - 08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H.M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 70/BANG/2017[2009 - 10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H.M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 72/BANG/2017[2011 - 12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H. M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 67/BANG/2017[2006 - 07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H. M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE - 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 69/BANG/2017[2008 - 09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

M/S. H.M. CONSTRUCTIONS,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL RANGE 1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals being ITA Nos

ITA 71/BANG/2017[2010 - 11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri. S. Annamalai, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Dilip, Junior Standing Counsel
Section 132Section 153A

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section

ACIT vs. M/S VSL MINING CO. P. LTD.,,

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2008-09 is dismissed

ITA 204/BANG/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jun 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Respondent: Shri. Pradeep Kumar, CIT
Section 10BSection 132Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 143(3)

depreciation based on material found in the course of search conducted by the Department in the case of some other person. This judgment also supports the contention of the assessee that no addition could be made in the assessments framed under section 153A of the Act, based on materials found and seized from some other person, unless provisions of section