Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh50 Bangalore5 Mumbai3 Pune3 Delhi3 Kolkata2 SC1 Ahmedabad1 Chennai1 Hyderabad1 Indore1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 26312 Section 143(3)10 Section 548 Section 54F6 Deduction4 Section 80P3 Condonation of Delay3 Section 1542 Exemption

M/S. YASHA PATTINA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NI,RAICHUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, , RAICHUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1177/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Channamalikarjuna Gowda, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Revenue

Section 154Section 253(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

delay of 150 days is condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 5. After hearing both the parties, I am of the opinion that similar issue came for consideration before this Tribunal in the case of M/s. CSI Credit Co-operative Society Vs. ITO cited (supra) wherein the Tribunal has held as under:- M/s. Yaksh Pattina Souharda Sahakari

M/S. YASHA PATTINA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NI,RAICHUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, , RAICHUR

M/S. YASHA PATTINA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NI,RAICHUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, , RAICHUR

DR. SHEELA PUTTABUDDI,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 3(3)(5), BANGALORE

MANOJ KUMAR EKAMBARAM ARCOT,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

SRI.LOKESH M, ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE

SRI.LOKESH M, LR OF SMT MALATHI LOKESH ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE