Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 54Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh50 Mumbai34 Kolkata5 Delhi2 Bangalore2 SC1 Calcutta1 Chennai1 Panaji1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 26312 Section 143(3)10 Section 54F6 Long Term Capital Gains2 Deduction2 Condonation of Delay2

SRI.LOKESH M, ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals by the assesses are partly allowed

ITA 292/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Oct 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravi Shankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K. Devrathna Kumar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54F

condone the delay in filing these appeals. 7. As far as merits of the appeal are concerned, the factual details that emerges from the record are that the Assessee and his deceased wife were co-owners of the property. By a sale deed dated 28.11.2012, they sold the property for a sale consideration of Rs.1,75,00,000/-. The Share

SRI.LOKESH M, ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE

SRI.LOKESH M, LR OF SMT MALATHI LOKESH ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE

SRI.LOKESH M, ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE

SRI.LOKESH M, LR OF SMT MALATHI LOKESH ,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 , BANGALORE