Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 282A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur5 Bangalore4 Indore3 Mumbai3 Hyderabad2 Amritsar2 Chennai1

Key Topics

Section 14A27 Section 143(2)10 Section 143(3)7 Disallowance3

INMOBI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE3(1)(1), BANGALORE

ITA 303/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

For Appellant: \nShri Chaitanya, Sr. Advocate a/wFor Respondent: \nMs. Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

282A, Rule 127, 127A. He submitted that the mandate of section 144B(1)(xxix) is that the DRP has to issue its directions to NaFAC. The Ld.Sr.Counsel admitted that, any communication with NaFAC will have to be essentially in the electronic mode as per section 144B(5)/(6), and that there is no scope for communication with NaFAC physically / manually

M/S. BHARAT BEEDI WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED,MANGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for all the four A