BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

44 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi158Chennai86Pune69Mumbai45Bangalore44Visakhapatnam37Lucknow25Ahmedabad25Surat25Karnataka21Indore18Cuttack16Kolkata15Hyderabad13Cochin13Rajkot9Jaipur8Amritsar7Chandigarh6Patna4Nagpur4Jabalpur3Agra3Raipur3SC2Allahabad1Guwahati1Ranchi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E178Section 200A145TDS36Section 271H32Section 10(5)15Condonation of Delay15Penalty15Addition to Income12Section 250

M/S. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,SHIVAMOGGA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

ITA 882/BANG/2023[26Q/Quarter-4/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri George George Kshri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Pai, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Nischal B, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 250

condone the delay in filing the appeal after relying on the above judgment. ITA Nos.882-890/Bang/2023 Page 10 of 17 19. Coming to the merit of the case, the sole issue involved in all these appeals are with regard to dismissing the appeal of the assessee by the CIT(A) for challenging the fee imposed u/s 234(E) for delay

SREE RAJENDRA SURI GURUMANDIR TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,(EXEMPTION) WARD-3,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 44 · Page 1 of 3

11
Section 23411
Section 272A(2)(e)9
Exemption9
ITA 2020/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: Disposed
ITAT Bangalore
04 Dec 2024
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2015-16 Sree Rajendrasuri Gurumandir Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), 25 & 25/1, Jain Temple Road, Ward – 3, Vishwweswarapuram, Bengaluru. Bengaluru – 560 004. Pan : Aajts 8921 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Suman Lunkar, Ar. Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 28.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2024 O R D E R Per Laxmi Prasad Sahuthis Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) [Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1056681273 (1)] Dated 30.09.2023. 2. The Sole & Substantiating Ground Raised By The Assessee To Challenge Order Of Nfac Confirming The Penalty Levied By The Ao Of Rs.54,700/- Under Section 272A(2)(E) Of The Act, For Delay In Filing The Return Of Income. The Due Date For Filing Return Of Income Was 30.09.2015 But The Assessee Filed Its Return On 31.03.2017. Accordingly, Ao Levied Penalty Under Section 272A(2)(E) Of The Act Of Rs.54,700/-. Page 2 Of 9 3. At The Outset Of Hearing, The Learned Counsel Drew Our Attention That The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Barred By 328 Days. However, The Registry Has Not Raised Any Defect Memo For Delay In Filing The Appeal. An Application Dated 22.11.2024 Has Been Filed By The Assessee Stating Therein The Reasons For Delay In Filing The Assessee Which Is As Under:

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, ARFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 139Section 143(1)Section 272A(2)(e)Section 275(1)(c)

section 272A(2)(e) of the Act of Rs.54,700/-. Page 2 of 9 3. At the outset of hearing, the learned Counsel drew our attention that the appeal filed by the assessee is barred by 328 days. However, the Registry has not raised any defect memo for delay in filing the appeal. An application dated 22.11.2024 has been filed

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)& TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 536/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q 3]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 535/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 534/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 533/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

KOOUD SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/BANG/2022[2013-14 (24Q-QII)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Tyagi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh D, JCIT(DR)
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234Section 234E

condoned in filing these appeals and the appeals are deemed to be filed in time for further adjudication. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a private limited company. The DCIT, CPC, Bangalore (AO) has passed the orders u/s 200A(1) the Act levying late fee towards the delay in filing the TDS returns

GURU KRIPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH TRUST ,UDUPI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE EXEMPTIONS , HUBLI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 400/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri R. Ramamurthy, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

272A(2)(e) of the IT Act of Rs. 1,13,700/- in Assessment Year 2013-14, Rs. 77,200/- in Assessment Year 2014-15 and Rs. 40,700/- in Assessment Year 2015-16. 3. For the sake of brevity, we reproduce the grounds raised by the assessee before the Tribunal from Assessment Year 2013-14 in ITA No. 399/Bang/2019

GURU KRIPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH TRUST ,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE EXEMPTIONS , BANGALORE

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 401/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Jul 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri R. Ramamurthy, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

272A(2)(e) of the IT Act of Rs. 1,13,700/- in Assessment Year 2013-14, Rs. 77,200/- in Assessment Year 2014-15 and Rs. 40,700/- in Assessment Year 2015-16. 3. For the sake of brevity, we reproduce the grounds raised by the assessee before the Tribunal from Assessment Year 2013-14 in ITA No. 399/Bang/2019

GURU KRIPA RURAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH TRUST ,UDUPI vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE EXEMPTIONS , HUBLI

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 399/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri R. Ramamurthy, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 139Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

272A(2)(e) of the IT Act of Rs. 1,13,700/- in Assessment Year 2013-14, Rs. 77,200/- in Assessment Year 2014-15 and Rs. 40,700/- in Assessment Year 2015-16. 3. For the sake of brevity, we reproduce the grounds raised by the assessee before the Tribunal from Assessment Year 2013-14 in ITA No. 399/Bang/2019

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 519/BANG/2021[2013-14 (24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 528/BANG/2021[2015-16 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Samrat Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 525/BANG/2021[2014-15 (24Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER POF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 520/BANG/2021[2013-14 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 527/BANG/2021[2014-15 (26Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMTED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 524/BANG/2021[2014-15 (24Q-Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 523/BANG/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 522/BANG/2021[2013-14 (26Q-Q4)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 521/BANG/2021[2013-14 (26Q-Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant

SAMRAT GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 526/BANG/2021[2014-15 (26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2021

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Siddesh Nagaraj GaddiFor Respondent: Sri.Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT-DR
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

E has to be levied only from the date of payment of tax deducted at source followed by the date of filing of returns but not from the due date of filing of statement considering the fact that TDS 3 ITA No.519/Bang/2021 & Ors. M/s.Sameer Granites Private Limited statements cannot be filed before payment of taxes. On this ground, the appellant