Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Delhi28 Cochin24 Jaipur22 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad15 Nagpur8 Bangalore6 Mumbai5 Chandigarh5 Visakhapatnam3 Chennai3 Lucknow2 Kolkata2 Surat2 Panaji1 SC1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 10(5)17 Section 271C9 Penalty6 TDS6 Addition to Income6 Section 2715 Section 105 Exemption5

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are allowed

ITA 2413/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri H. MuralidharaFor Respondent: Shri Manjeet Singh, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 10Section 10(5)Section 271

delay in filing appeals is therefore condoned. ITA Nos. 2413 to 2415/Bang/2019 Page 10 of 15 11. As far as the merits of the case relating to imposition of penalty u/s.271C of the Act, the learned counsel for the Assessee submitted that the Hon’ble ITAT Jaipur Bench in the case of State Bank of India Vs. ACIT

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE - 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE - 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE- 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE - 3, BANGALORE

M/S. STATE BANK OF INDIA,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS RANGE - 3, BANGALORE

STATE BANK OF INDIA,JAYANAGAR BRANCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), WARD-3(2), BANGALORE