KARNATAKA BANK LTD,MANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE 1 (1) & TPS, MANGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue fails and is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year: 2008-09

2 SCC770),Parimal v. Veena [(2011) 3 SCC 545] and Moniben Devraj Shah v. Municipal Corpn.of Brihan Mumbai (2012) 5- SCC 157].)” (b) Ajay Dabre v. Pyare Ram 2023 SCC Online SC 92: ‘13. This Court in the case of Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer while rejecting an application for condonation of delay for lack of sufficient cause

M/S. INDIANOIL SKYTAKING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

condonation of delay, if any. With these observations, the additional ground by the assessee for all the assessment years is dismissed. 11. The brief facts of the case are that assessee was incorporated on 21.07.2006 under the Companies Act with following JV Companies viz., IndianOil, IOT Infrastructure & Energy Services Limited (IOT I & ESL) and Skytanking, Germany with equal participation

INDIANOIL SKYTANKING PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

condonation of delay, if any. With these observations, the additional ground by the assessee for all the assessment years is dismissed. 11. The brief facts of the case are that assessee was incorporated on 21.07.2006 under the Companies Act with following JV Companies viz., IndianOil, IOT Infrastructure & Energy Services Limited (IOT I & ESL) and Skytanking, Germany with equal participation

M/S INDIANOIL SKYTANKING PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

condonation of delay, if any. With these observations, the additional ground by the assessee for all the assessment years is dismissed. 11. The brief facts of the case are that assessee was incorporated on 21.07.2006 under the Companies Act with following JV Companies viz., IndianOil, IOT Infrastructure & Energy Services Limited (IOT I & ESL) and Skytanking, Germany with equal participation

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C-1(1)(1), BENGALURU vs. AD2PRO MEDIA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, BENGALURU

In the result, all the 14 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

condone the delay of 37 days and 44 days in filing appeals for Assessment Years 2016-17 and 2017-18 and proceed to dispose off the same on merits. 3. Identical grounds are raised in both the appeals. The grounds raised read as follows: "1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) was right

MR.ZAMIR MIRZA ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for asst

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boazshri Zamir Mirza, Flat No.4A, Iv Floor, Mayfair Apartments No.31, Berlie Street, Langford Town, Bengaluru. . Appellant Pan – Acapm2850L. Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle-1(1), Bengaluru. . Respondent Appellant By : Shri K.Y Ningoji Rao, C.A Respondent By : Smt. Padmameenakshi, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 26-09-2017 Date Of Pronouncement : -10-2017 O R D E R Per Shri Jason P Boaz:

260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 27/3/2014. PETITION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL FOR ASST. YEAR 1996-97 BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL 2.1 Along with the appeal memo in Form No.36, the assessee has filed a petition seeking condonation of delay of 57 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal, accompanied

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S MAINI MATERIAL MOVEMENT PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri. Abraham P. George & Shri. Vijaypal Raoi.T.A No.1049/Bang/2015 (Assessment Year : 2008-09) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -12(1), Bangalore .. Appellant V. M/S. Maini Material Movement P. Ltd, 131, 6Th Floor, Devatha Plaza, Residency Road, Bangalore .. Respondent Pan : Aabcm8922D Assessee By : Ms. Susan Matew, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Sunil Kumar Agarwala, Jcit Heard On : 24.11.2015 Pronounced On : 27.11.2015 O R D E R Per Abraham P. George:

2 contribution towards PF and ESI within the due date mentioned in the respective statutes. 02. Case of the Revenue is that employees contribution is different from employers’contribution. As per the Revenue, if employees contribution’is not remitted within the due dates then by virtue of Section 36(1)(va) of the Act, claim for deduction could

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C-1(1)(1), BANGALORE vs. AD2PRO MEDIA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

section 260A of the Act before the Hon'ble High Court. The\nHon'ble High Court vide its judgment dated 24.02.2023 had dismissed the\nRevenue's appeal in ITA No.234, 235, 238, 241, 242 and 243 of 2020. In light of\nthe above orders of the Tribunal which was confirmed by the Hon'ble High Court\nin assessee