M/S SAINT -GOBAIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-6(1)(1), BANGALORE
In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2295/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Apr 2019AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita. No.2295/Bang/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Saint-Gobain India Private Vs. Dcit, Limited Circle-6(1)(1), (For The Merged Entity Saint-Gobain Bmtc Building, 80 Feet Crystals & Detectors India Limited) Road, 6Th Block, 171/2, Maruthi Indl. Estate Koramangala, Hoodi Rajapalya, Whitefield Bangalore – 560095. Main Road, Bangalore – 560001. Pan: Aaacb 6794 R (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee: Shri Sharatha Rao For Revenue : Smt Renuga Devi, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 09.04.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 15.04.2019 Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm. The Assessee Has Filed An Appeal Against The Order Of The Cit (A)-6, Bangalore, Dated 31/01/2018 Passed U/S 143(3) & U/S 250 Of The It Act, 1961 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. At The Outset, We Notice That There Is A Delay Of 65 Days In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal. Ld Ar Drawn Our Attention To The Affidavit Filed By The Assessee, Explaining The Reasons For Not Filing The Appeal
For Appellant: Shri Sharatha RaoFor Respondent: Smt Renuga Devi, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 244ASection 250
condone the delay of 65 days and admit the appeal of the assessee.
4. At the time of hearing, Ld AR has not pressed the Grounds of Appeal “B” in respect of income corresponding to TDS appearing in Form
26AS and made endorsement in the appeal memo. Accordingly, the said
Ground “B” is treated as not pressed and dismissed
