Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24 Ahmedabad10 Mumbai5 Bangalore4 Pune3 Rajkot1 Jaipur1 Kolkata1 Lucknow1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 115B7 Section 143(1)6 Section 139(1)5 Section 234A4 Deduction4 Section 2503 Section 113 Section 80J2 Section 234F2

CHIKKANNAPUTTAMMA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS)WARD-1 , BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1513/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Sri Pranav G. Ambekar, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Department

Section 1Section 11Section 119Section 12ASection 234Section 234ASection 250

234F of the Act. Chikkanna Puttamma Educational Trust, Bangalore Page 4 of 9 2.1 Aggrieved by the intimation passed u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 30.9.2019, the assessee preferred an appeal before the ld. Addl/JCIT(A). In the meanwhile, after filing the audit report on 11.5.2023, the assessee has also moved an application for condonation of delay in filing

CHIKKANNAPUTTAMMA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS)WARD-1 , BENGALURU

CHIKKANNAPUTTAMMA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTIONS)WARD-1 , BENGALURU

UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BENGALURU

THE NARAGUND TALUKA PRATHAMIKA SHIKSAK SHIKSAKIYAR CO OP CREDIT S LIMITED ,NARGUND vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GADAG

ARATHI VINAY PATIL ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3)(4), BENGALURU