BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

27 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Patna466Pune125Chennai103Delhi65Nagpur44Visakhapatnam29Bangalore27Cochin23Dehradun19Hyderabad15Mumbai15Jaipur10Panaji10Kolkata9Amritsar6Raipur6Rajkot5Surat5Indore5Agra4Chandigarh3Lucknow3Guwahati2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E140Section 200A74Section 271H32TDS27Condonation of Delay23Section 25020Limitation/Time-bar20Addition to Income8Section 271(1)(a)

M/S. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,SHIVAMOGGA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

ITA 882/BANG/2023[26Q/Quarter-4/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri George George Kshri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Pai, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Nischal B, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 250

condone the delay in filing the appeal after relying on the above judgment. ITA Nos.882-890/Bang/2023 Page 10 of 17 19. Coming to the merit of the case, the sole issue involved in all these appeals are with regard to dismissing the appeal of the assessee by the CIT(A) for challenging the fee imposed u/s 234(E) for delay

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)& TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

4
Section 24
Penalty4
ITA 536/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q 3]Status: Disposed
ITAT Bangalore
23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 533/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 534/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 535/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

delay in filing the appeal which is as under: 3. On going through the above condonation petition that the assessee had reasonable cause for not to file appeal within the speicified date and the reasons have been explained. Therefore, relying on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Katiji

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 564/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 565/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 561/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 556/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 557/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 558/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 563/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 533/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 554/BANG/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 555/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1)(, BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 559/BANG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 560/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 566/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 567/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

M/S. PRAKAT SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 562/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri. Ramakrishna Kamat, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT (DR), ITAT, Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

Section 234E can be said as without any authority of law. 3. The appellant relies on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Collector Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji 1987 taxmann.com 1072/167 ITR 471wherein it was held that a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay