BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

233 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai380Delhi309Mumbai301Bangalore233Pune142Nagpur129Karnataka129Kolkata124Jaipur104Ahmedabad101Raipur58Cochin51Hyderabad45Visakhapatnam45Indore36Surat33Chandigarh29Kerala17Rajkot14Cuttack12Varanasi12Lucknow12Jodhpur10Dehradun9Patna8SC6Agra5Amritsar5Panaji4Calcutta4Guwahati3Jabalpur3Andhra Pradesh2Rajasthan1Telangana1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1

Key Topics

Section 234E190Section 200159Section 206C96Section 200A64Deduction58Section 20155TDS42Addition to Income37Section 40

JURIMATRIX SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(3)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 92/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed\Nand\Nshri Keshav Dubey\Nita No.92/Bang/2025\N Assessment Years:2018-19\Njurimatrix Services India Pvt. Ltd.\Ng4, Aspen Building\Nmanyata Embassy Business Park\Nhebbal\Nbangalore 560045\Npan No: Aabcj6157D\Nappellant\Nacit\Nvs. Circle 4(3)(1)\Nbangalore\Nrespondent\Nappellant By : Sri K.R. Girish, A.R.\Nrespondent By : Ms. Neha Sahay, D.R.\Ndate Of Hearing : 21.04.2025\Ndate Of Pronouncement: 15.07.2025\Norder\Nper Keshav Dubey:\Nthis Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against\Nthe Order Of The Ld. Pcit Dated 30.03.2023 Vide Din & Order No.\Nitba/Rev/F/Rev5/2022-23/1051648832(1) Passed U/S 263 Of\Nthe Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”) For The Assessment\Nyear 2018-19.\N2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:\Ngeneral Grounds Of Appeal\N1.

For Appellant: Sri K.R. Girish, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, D.R
Section 10ASection 115JSection 144Section 156Section 234A

Showing 1–20 of 233 · Page 1 of 12

...
34
Section 200(3)32
Condonation of Delay28
Section 201(1)24
Section 234B
Section 263
Section 270A

201\nDisallowance of delayed employee contribution of PF & ESI under 36(1)(va) -\nRs 13,24,213\nAdditionally, in the computation of income forming part of assessment order dated 23\nMarch 2024, the Ld. AO had made certain mistakes which were apparent from\nrecord. The following mistakes apparent from record were made:\nDeduction u/s 10AA of the Act amounting

M/S. RMZ HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 954/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 234Section 255Section 255(3)Section 36

condone the above delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 4. The first ground for our consideration is with regard to the disallowance of Rs.99,02,829/-, which is claimed by assessee as an interest payment. The assessee in the year under consideration advanced a sum of Rs.41 crores towards purchase of shares. The AO questioned the sources of Rs.41

M/S. VTH SOURCE COMPONENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS-3), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessees is treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2620/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri V Sudheendranath, ARFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshini Mishra, Addl. CIT(DR)
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause (d); and (f) the amount of refund due to the deductor

SHRI. MARATE VENKATESHKUMAR ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(6), HUBLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 819/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri B. Venugopal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 250Section 69A

201'9, my considered view is that the aforesaid decision of the ITAT — Mumbai Bench (supra) is squarely applicable to the facts of the case on hand, where the entries are recorded in the assessee's books of account. In this view the matter, I am of the opinion that the addition of Rs. 6,30,000 made under section

INMOBI TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE3(1)(1), BANGALORE

ITA 303/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Jun 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Chaitanya, Sr. Advocate a/wFor Respondent: \nMs. Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 92C

section 142[1], either the Assessing Officer or the Prescribed Income- tax Authority, as the case may be, if, it is considered necessary or expedient to ensure that an assessee has not understated the income or has not computed excessive loss or has not underpaid tax in any manner, shall serve on the assessee a notice for attendance or production

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2132/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2131/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2127/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2123/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2126/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2124/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2130/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2121/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2117/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2119/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2122/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2120/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2129/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC - TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2118/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause

MS. SEENA DEEPAK,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC -TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2128/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri B R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Nishi Padma, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234E

201 or section 234E and any amount paid otherwise by way of tax or interest or fee; ITA Nos.2117 to 2132/Bang/2019 Page 4 of 9 (e) an intimation shall be prepared or generated and sent to the deductor specifying the sum determined to be payable by, or the amount of refund due to, him under clause