BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 158Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi26Bangalore6Dehradun4Kolkata2Mumbai2

Key Topics

Section 14812Section 158A6Limitation/Time-bar6

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1932/BANG/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1933/BANG/2017[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1934/BANG/2017[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1935/BANG/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1936/BANG/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee

HUBLI DHARWAD STOCK TRADING HOUSE ,HUBLI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), HUBLI

In the result, all these six appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1937/BANG/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Smt. Pratibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 148Section 158A

condoned the delay and dismissed these appeals. She submitted that as per the reasons of delay explained before CIT (A) and noted by him in Para 8 of his order, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the A. O. will keep the assessment proceedings in abeyance till the disposal of SLP by Hon’ble Apex Court because the assessee