BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 151Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai69Hyderabad26Mumbai19Pune13Ahmedabad8Kolkata7Delhi6Visakhapatnam5Lucknow5Surat3Bangalore3Jaipur3Rajkot2Chandigarh2Patna2Raipur2Amritsar1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 14811Section 148A9Section 1475Section 54F3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 143(2)2Section 142(1)2Reopening of Assessment

VARUN MANJUNATHA ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1278/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore15 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Joseph Varghese, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian .S, JCIT (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 234ASection 250

151A(1) and section 130 of the Act and notification issued thereunder on the facts and circumstances of the case. 10. The information on the basis of which show cause notice u/s 148A(b) was issued not provided to the appellant along with the show cause notice and consequently the same is without jurisdiction

2
Capital Gains2
Long Term Capital Gains2

KEMPAIAH NAGARAJ,BANGALORE vs. NA, NA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2651/BANG/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 194ISection 54F

Section 151A and Faceless Reassessment Scheme 6. Without prejudice, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) also erred in not considering the detailed responses and evidences filed before the Assessing Officer, justifying the claim of indexed costs of acquisition and improvement and exemption u/s. 54F. And for other reasons and grounds that may be adduced later, it is humbly prayed that this appeal

M/S. CRYSTAL GRANITE AND MARBLE PRIVATE LIMITED,RAMANAGARAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and Stay Petition is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 405/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahus.P No.29/Bang/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Rajgopal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Vidya K, JCIT (DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

151A of the Act. Consequently, the reassessment notices in all the writ petitions are quashed. It is left open to the respective assessing authorities to initiate reassessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021, after making all compliances, as required by law." (ii). Rajeev Bansal [2023] 147 taxmann.com 549 (Allahabad