Search: condonation of delay

27 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 148A49 Section 14848 Section 14738 Section 25015 Addition to Income13 Section 69A12 Cash Deposit12 Section 142(1)9 Section 108

M/S. CRYSTAL GRANITE AND MARBLE PRIVATE LIMITED,RAMANAGARAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and Stay Petition is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 405/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahus.P No.29/Bang/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Rajgopal, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. Vidya K, JCIT (DR)

Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250

148A, 149, 151 & 151A of the Act. Consequently, the reassessment notices in all the writ petitions are quashed. It is left open to the respective assessing authorities to initiate reassessment proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Act as amended by Finance Act, 2021, after making all compliances, as required by law." (ii). Rajeev Bansal [2023] 147 taxmann.com

Showing 1–20 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

M/S. CRYSTAL GRANITE AND MARBLE PRIVATE LIMITED,RAMANAGARAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

M/S. CRYSTAL GRANITE AND MARBLE PRIVATE LIMITED,RAMANAGARAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

E ASHWATH NARAYAN,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

TAKRAR RANGANATHA RAO NAGASHRE ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2)(1), , BENGALURU

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITEE,CHAMARAJANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHAMARAJNAGAR

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE,CHAMARAJNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHAMARAJNAGAR

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE,CHAMARAJANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHAMARAJANAGAR

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING COMMITTEE,CHAMARAJNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHAMARAJNAGAR

BIJAPUR DIST POLICE CO OP SOCIETY LIMITED,VIJAYPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 , VIJAYPUR

IRENE PEREIRA ,UDUPI vs. ITO WARD- 1&TPS, UDUPI

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. NUTRICRAFT INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, BENGALURU

SAROJAMMA,RAMANAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , RAMANAGAR

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 AND TPS, BAGALKOT vs. JYOTI CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED , BADAMI

AREHALLI RUDRAPPA VISHWANATHA,AREHALLY,TEMPLE,BELUR vs. INCOME- TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, HASSAN

STAR CERAMICS ,CHITRADURGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, CHITRADURGA

KENNEDY EDUCATION SOCIETY,MYSORE vs. ITO, WARD-2(4), MYSORE

HEDDUR VYAVASAYA SEVA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMITHA ,SHIMOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS , SHIMOGA

VARUN MANJUNATHA ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BANGALORE

SMT. KASHAVVA S RANGARADDIYAVAR,GADAG vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1) & TPS, , HUBLI

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, SHIVAMOGGA vs. M/S. MANASA MEDICALS, SHIVAMOGGA

SRI. SRUSTI ASSCIATES ,BELLARY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, BELLARY