Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 140Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore3 Chennai1 Dehradun1 Mumbai1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 153C12 Section 143(3)9 Section 139(1)6 Section 1326 Section 133A3 Section 693 Section 115B3 Section 153A3 Unexplained Investment3 TDS3 Addition to Income3 Search & Seizure3

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 541/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

condone the delay and treat the return as a valid return. Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, a return of income shall be regarded as defective unless all the following conditions are fulfilled, namely :— 62-63(a) the annexures, statements and columns in the return of income relating to computation of income chargeable under each head of income

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU