Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 140Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24 Karnataka23 Delhi10 Mumbai10 Cochin6 Kolkata5 Chandigarh5 Bangalore4 Jaipur4 Varanasi3 Chennai3 Raipur2 Rajkot1 SC1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 153C12 Section 143(3)9 Section 139(1)6 Section 1326 Addition to Income4 Condonation of Delay4 Section 133A3 Section 693 Section 115B

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 539/BANG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.V. Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Parthivel, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 115BSection 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed income tax return u/s. 139(1) for all the 3 years. Search and seizure action was conducted u/s. 132 of the Act on 01.02.2017 in the business premises of Badagabettu Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., Udupi and documents were seized

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PALKAD,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, UDUPI

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

MR. SALEEM THANGAL KADER PLAKAD,INDIVIDUAL,UDUPI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU

SYED WAHID,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE