SRI PUTTASWAMACHARI (HUF) ,MYSORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(2), MYSORE
In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 2736/BANG/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jun 2019AY 2006-07
Bench: Shri Arun Kumar Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale
For Appellant: Shri Narendra Sharma, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.N. Dhandapani, JCIT (DR)
Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)
condone the delay and admit these three appeals.
4. Regarding the merit of these appeals, it was submitted by ld. AR of assessee that as per the order of ld. CIT(A) in quantum proceedings, it is held by CIT(A) that the assessee failed to furnish the valid PAN as per law and stated that PAN in Form