BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 12A(1)(ac)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune227Ahmedabad142Mumbai122Jaipur86Chennai79Kolkata52Delhi44Calcutta34Hyderabad33Surat27Chandigarh24Rajkot23Nagpur18Bangalore16Lucknow14Amritsar11Cochin11Indore10Visakhapatnam6Agra5Patna5Jabalpur4Panaji4Jodhpur3Raipur2Guwahati2Ranchi2Dehradun2Allahabad2

Key Topics

Section 12A48Exemption16Section 12A(1)(ac)8Section 80G8Natural Justice8Section 12A(1)6Charitable Trust6Section 115Section 1195

SHRI HINGULAMBIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GULBARGA vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, KALBURGI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1126/BANG/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2020-21

For Appellant: Shri Phalguna Kumar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shahnawaz Ul Rahman, D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

AC Provisional Registration is issued for 21- 22 to 23-24 three Asst years. Based on this only the Appellant has filed its Return of Income on 31.5.2021 for the Asst Year 2020-21, as the relevant due date was extended due to Covid-19. Thus here the Return is filed after applying and obtaining the provisional Registration. Thus

Limitation/Time-bar5
Condonation of Delay5
Section 143(2)3

KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DCIT-(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1267/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear:2016-17

For Appellant: Sri N. Suresh, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, D.R
Section 250Section 253(5)

condoning the short delay of 41 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal and admit the same for adjudication. 7. Now coming to the brief facts of the case are that the assessee Trust e-filed its return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 belatedly u/s 139(4) of the Act on 18.1.2018 declaring nil income after

MARINE DRISHTI AND COSTAL FOUNDATION ,GOA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 454/BANG/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Dr. K. Shivaram, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri E. Shridhar, D.R
Section 12ASection 253Section 80G

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 7. Now the brief facts of the case are that the assessee “Marine Drishti Coastal Foundation” was incorporated on 24/05/2022 under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 as a non-profit organization to promote commerce, arts, science, sports, education, research, charity, protection of the environment, promote diverse cultural and heritage

MARINE DRISHTI AND COSTAL FOUNDATION ,GOA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 455/BANG/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Dr. K. Shivaram, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri E. Shridhar, D.R
Section 12ASection 253Section 80G

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 7. Now the brief facts of the case are that the assessee “Marine Drishti Coastal Foundation” was incorporated on 24/05/2022 under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 as a non-profit organization to promote commerce, arts, science, sports, education, research, charity, protection of the environment, promote diverse cultural and heritage

MARINE DRISHTI AND COASTAL FOUNDATION ,GOA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BANGALORE, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 456/BANG/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Dr. K. Shivaram, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri E. Shridhar, D.R
Section 12ASection 253Section 80G

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 7. Now the brief facts of the case are that the assessee “Marine Drishti Coastal Foundation” was incorporated on 24/05/2022 under section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 as a non-profit organization to promote commerce, arts, science, sports, education, research, charity, protection of the environment, promote diverse cultural and heritage

SHRI GURUDARBAR SEVA MANDAL BELGAUM,BELGAUM vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 598/BANG/2024[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2024AY 2024-2025

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2024-25

For Appellant: Shri P.S. Kulkarni, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 10Section 119Section 12ASection 35Section 80G

ac) of sub section (1) of section 12A. In all other respects the trust had complied with provisions of section 12AB just or this technical breach the learned CIT(Exemptions) rejected the renewal of registration. We attach herewith order of IT Chennai wherein Hon. Tribunal has set aside the order of rejection. Shri Gurudarbar Seva Mandal, Belgaum Page

SRI SHARADA FOUNDATION TRUST,KOPPAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 714/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 May 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2024-25

For Appellant: Ms. Suman Lunkar, CA
Section 119Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act ii) such application was rejected merely on the ground of selection of wrong section code. Page 3 of 6 iii) The appellant vide order dated 21/02/2023 was allowed to file the application afresh selecting the correct section code. iv) The revised application dated 05/10/2023 filed for final registration replaces the original application

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BENGALAURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1320/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jan 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri V Chandrasekhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)

1. The order of rejection for approval under section 80G of the Act passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax [Exemptions], Bengaluru dated 23/03/2024, in so far as it is against the Appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, requires to be quashed. 2. The learned Principal Commissioner

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1319/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jan 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

For Appellant: Shri V Chandrasekhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)

1. The order of rejection for approval under section 80G of the Act passed by the learned Principal Commissioner of Income-tax [Exemptions], Bengaluru dated 23/03/2024, in so far as it is against the Appellant is opposed to law, weight of evidence, probabilities, facts and circumstances of the Appellant's case, requires to be quashed. 2. The learned Principal Commissioner

SHRI PURUSHOTTAMA NARASIMHA BHARATI SANATANA SABHA,UTTARA KANNADA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS, WARD-1, HUBLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust is allowed

ITA 661/BANG/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Jun 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2024-25

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Hedge, CAFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, JCIT-DR
Section 12A

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for the adjudication. 4. Now coming to brief facts of the case is that the assessee trust was granted provisional registration vide no. AALTS5798QE20206 under 02-Sub clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A

SHRI SADGURU NIRUPADESHWARA NITYA DASOHA CHARITABLE TRUST ANKALIMATH,MUDGAL, LINGASURU TQ RAICHUR DIST vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, EXEMPTION WARD-1,KALBURGI, KALBURGI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 457/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Aug 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Ramanagowda S Gowdar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian JCIT, DR
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 162 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. . ITA No.1084 & 457/Bang/2025 Page 7 of 14 9. Now coming to the brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust constituted vide deed of trust dated 13.2.2009. The trust is having following aims and objectives as per the trust deed: “Aims and objectives

SHRI SADGURU NIRUPADESHWARA NITYA DASOHA CHARITABLE TRUST ANKALIMATH,MAKAPUR, LINGASURU TQ AND RAICHUR DIST vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,EXEMPTION, EXEMPTION WARD-1,KALBURGI, KALBURGI,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1084/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Aug 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Ramanagowda S Gowdar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian JCIT, DR
Section 12ASection 80G

condone the delay of 162 days and admit the appeal for adjudication. . ITA No.1084 & 457/Bang/2025 Page 7 of 14 9. Now coming to the brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust constituted vide deed of trust dated 13.2.2009. The trust is having following aims and objectives as per the trust deed: “Aims and objectives

SWAMI VIVEKANANDA EDUCATION SOCIETY (REGD),BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 885/BANG/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmedr Assessment Year : Na M/S. Swamy Vivekananda Educational Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Society (Regd.), Bengaluru. C A No-5A, 3Rd Cross, B S K 1St State, 2Nd Block, Bengaluru – 560 050. Pan : Aaats 3988 D Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Pundarikaksha, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ramanathan, Addl. Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 10.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.06.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Pundarikaksha, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ramanathan, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is reproduced as under : “where the trust or institution has been provisionally registered u/s.12AB, at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional registration or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier". 4. In view of the above, the application filed in Form

PRABODHAN TRUST,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 856/BANG/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmedr Assessment Year : Na M/S. Prabodhan Trust, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Nil, Times Square Apartment, Bengaluru. Green Glen Layout, Bellandur, Bengaluru – 560 103. Pan : Aaetp 6785 F Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. H. V. Gowthama, Ca Revenue By : Shri. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 06.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.06.2024

For Appellant: Shri. H. V. Gowthama, CAFor Respondent: Shri. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is reproduced as under : “where the trust or institution has been provisionally registered u/s.12AB. at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional registration or within six months of commencement of its activities, whichever is earlier". 4. In view of the above. the application filed in Form

CHIGURU VIGNANA SAMSTHE,MYSORE vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS) BANGALORE, BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 584/BANG/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan Kassessment Year : 2024-25

For Appellant: Ms. Pooja, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Shivanand H Kalakeri, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80G(5)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Page 3 of 4 4. The learned Counsel submitted that the assessee is a society registered under the Karnataka Society Act, 1960, and also registered with Public Education Department under Government of Karnataka and the assessee is also registered under section 12A(1)(ac

RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 703/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 142Section 143(2)

12A(a) and the annual receipts exceed Rs 10 crore and jurisdiction was with the Exemption Circle, the ITO, Ward - 7(2)(1) has transferred the case to the Exemptions Ward, Bengaluru, without proper authority and compliance with the S. Provisions. (v) As would be observed from the Ann. 0 Page 106, even after the case reached the Exemption Ward