BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

402 results for “condonation of delay”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,436Mumbai1,386Delhi950Pune751Kolkata586Ahmedabad526Jaipur450Bangalore402Hyderabad367Chandigarh243Surat241Cochin241Indore184Karnataka175Raipur154Lucknow154Nagpur153Visakhapatnam141Cuttack132Rajkot118Amritsar94Patna75Agra63Calcutta54Guwahati52Panaji31Ranchi31Allahabad30Dehradun29SC27Jabalpur25Jodhpur20Varanasi12Telangana12Orissa4Punjab & Haryana2Himachal Pradesh2Rajasthan1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Penalty75Section 143(3)54Addition to Income51Condonation of Delay45Section 271(1)(c)42Section 25033Section 27430Section 153A26Section 148

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

ITA 425/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Revenue by : Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and hear the same on merits of the matter for the advancement of substantial cause of justice. 7. Similar submissions were provided by the assessee in the penalty

Showing 1–20 of 402 · Page 1 of 21

...
23
Section 69A22
Section 14721
Disallowance21

THE KARNATAKA CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSOCIATION®,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1) , BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 703/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R
Section 147Section 20Section 202Section 249(3)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. There was a delay of 351 days in filing the appeal before NFAC. The assessee filed a condonation

THE KARNATAKA CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSOCIATION®,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 702/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R
Section 147Section 20Section 202Section 249(3)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. There was a delay of 351 days in filing the appeal before NFAC. The assessee filed a condonation

THE KARNATAKA CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSOCIATION®,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 700/BANG/2024[2013-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2024AY 2013-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R
Section 147Section 20Section 202Section 249(3)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. There was a delay of 351 days in filing the appeal before NFAC. The assessee filed a condonation

THE KARNATAKA CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSOCIATION®,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(2)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 704/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R
Section 147Section 20Section 202Section 249(3)Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)

penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. There was a delay of 351 days in filing the appeal before NFAC. The assessee filed a condonation

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

ITA 423/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Revenue byFor Respondent: Date of Hearing
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and hear the same on merits of the matter for the advancement of substantial cause of justice. 7. Similar submissions were provided by the assessee in the penalty

SRI. SUHAS SURESH SHET,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD-2(1), BENGALURU

In the result, these two assessee’s appeals are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Shankar, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Basaganni, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271F

delay of 775 days, though these appeals ought to have been filed within thirty days from the receipt of the penalty orders. The assessee filed condonation

SRI. SUHAS SURESH SHET,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, WARD-2(1), BENGALURU

In the result, these two assessee’s appeals are treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 607/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Apr 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Shankar, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Basaganni, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)Section 271Section 271(1)(c)Section 271F

delay of 775 days, though these appeals ought to have been filed within thirty days from the receipt of the penalty orders. The assessee filed condonation

SHRI. MARATE VENKATESHKUMAR ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(6), HUBLI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 819/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Dec 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Madhumita Royassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri B. Venugopal, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 250Section 69A

penalty notice issued u/s 270A & 270AAC of the Act directing him to file reply in response to the notice issued. Consequent to this, assessee consulted his advocate and taken steps to file the appeal before this Tribunal. Thus, it caused 424 days delay in filing the appeal before this Tribunal and prayed to condone

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 421/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 424/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 426/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 422/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 428/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 427/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 429/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 420/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Respondent: Shri Narendra Sharma
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay to be condoned and dismissed all the appeals filed against the assessment / penalty orders. ITA Nos. 418 to 429/Bang/2024

SRINIVASAN NARAYANAN,HOSUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1012/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. S. Praveena, CIT-DR

condone the delay in filing the appeals filed against the orders passed in quantum and penalty appeals. Page 2 of 12 ITA Nos. 1008 to 1012/Bang/2024

SRINIVASAN NARAYANAN,HOSUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1008/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. S. Praveena, CIT-DR

condone the delay in filing the appeals filed against the orders passed in quantum and penalty appeals. Page 2 of 12 ITA Nos. 1008 to 1012/Bang/2024

SRINIVASAN NARAYANAN,HOSUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1009/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. S. Praveena, CIT-DR

condone the delay in filing the appeals filed against the orders passed in quantum and penalty appeals. Page 2 of 12 ITA Nos. 1008 to 1012/Bang/2024