SHROUTA VIJNAM GURUKULAM,MANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTIONS, MANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : Na M/S. Shrouta Vijnan Gurukulam, Vs. Ito (Exemptions), 1 Nidagod, Targod B. O. Ward – 1, Arasapur, Mangaluru. Uttara Kannada – 561 402. Pan : Aants 0655 A Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Prakash S Hegde, Ca Revenue By : Shri. D. K. Mishra, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 20.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.05.2024 O R D E R Per George George K: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against The Cit(E)’S Order Dated 22.02.2024 Rejecting The Assessee’S Application Seeking Approval Under Section 80G Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called ‘The Act’).

charitable trust to another trust which carried out repair and renovation of Lord Vishnu’s temple did not disentitle the petitioner-trust from renewal of its exemption certificate under section 80G

SRI ASHVALAYANA VRUNDA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

charitable trust to another trust which carried out repair and renovation of Lord Vishnu’s temple did not disentitle the petitioner-trust from renewal of its exemption certificate under section 80G

SRI ASHVALAYANA VRUNDA,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee-trust are allowed

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Ms.Padmavathy S, Am

charitable trust to another trust which carried out repair and renovation of Lord Vishnu’s temple did not disentitle the petitioner-trust from renewal of its exemption certificate under section 80G

SRI CHANNAMALLIKARJUNA TRUST COMMITTEE,KOPPAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Sri Channamallikarjuna Trust Cit (Exemption), Vs. Committee Gangavathi Bengaluru. Sri Mallikarjuna Mutta – Gangavathi, District Koppal – 583 227. Pan : Aajts 7938 J Appellant Respondent

80G applies only to charitable trusts or institutions. It does not apply to religious trusts or institutions whereas scheme of exemption u/s 12A applies to both charitable as well as religious trusts. Section

ANUGRAHA EDUCATION TRUST,SULLIA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

trust. The mere fact that assessee being an educational\ninstitution received school bus fees, tuition fees and exam fees, the\napproval u/s 80G of the Act cannot be denied specially when it is\nestablish for the charitable purposes within the meaning of section

SHRI PURUSHOTTAMA NARASIMHA BHARATI SANATANA SABHA,UTTARA KANNADA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTIONS, WARD-1, HUBLI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2024-25

section 80G. S. 80G (5) provides that the trust should be established for a “charitable purpose”. Explanation 3 to s. 80G

ACHARYA SRI TULSI MAHAPRAGYA SEVA KENDRA CHARITABLE TRUST ,BANGALORE vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for\nstatistical purposes

sections": [ "80G", "80G(5)", "12A", "12AB", "2(15)" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the 80G approval without providing sufficient opportunity and considering all evidence, and if the trust's activities are indeed charitable

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

charitable institutions vide various CBDT circulars and finally, vide Circular - 29 - ITANos.827, 875 & 1136/Chny/2023 No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023. Similarly, the timeline prescribed forfiling Form No.10A for recognition u/s.80G of the Act was also extended up-to 30.09.2023 by the samecircular for trusts filing registration under clause (i) to first proviso to section 80G

KANCHI PERIYAVA TRUST-MYSORE,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), BENGALAURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav

charitable institutions vide various CBDT circulars and finally, vide Circular - 29 - ITANos.827, 875 & 1136/Chny/2023 No.6/2023 dated 24.05.2023. Similarly, the timeline prescribed forfiling Form No.10A for recognition u/s.80G of the Act was also extended up-to 30.09.2023 by the samecircular for trusts filing registration under clause (i) to first proviso to section 80G

CITY HOSPITAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,MANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: Na

Charitable Trust, Mangalore Page 4 of 10 proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G from 07.04.2022 to assessment year

M/S HERITAGE PARAMPARA ,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (E) , BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boazassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Heritage Parampara, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income No.1, Chinmaya Apartment, Tax (Exemptions), Puttanna Road, Bengaluru. Basavanagudi, Bengaluru – 560 004. Pan : Aabth 8132 M Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. H. V. Gowthama, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing : 10.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 04.09.2019

charitable trust constituted vide trust deed dated 06.12.2017. The assessee filed applications in Form No.10A seeking Page 2 of 7 registration under section 12AA of the Act and for recognition under section 80G

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST ,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST ,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST ,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST ,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

M/S BANDANTHAMMA MATHU KALAMMA TRUST ,MYSORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(4), MYSORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Smt.Beena Pillai, Jm

Charitable Trust" and the reasons recorded for re-opening of assessment, other statutory notices and the assessment is concluded and framed in the name of "M/s. Bhandanthamma Mathu Kalamma Trust" consequently the entire proceedings become void ab into, on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax [Appeals] failed to appreciate that the reasons

BUILDING A BETTER TOMORROW FOUNDATION ,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) , BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19 is allowed

Bench: Shri Jason P Boaz & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Building A Better Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Tomorrow Foundation, (Exemptions), Level 3, Comcorde Block, Bengaluru. Ub City, No.24, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru. Pan : Aadtb 3451 H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Narendra Kumar Jain, Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Neera Malhotra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 27.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.07.2019

80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as under:- Page 2 of 7 2.1 The assessee is a charitable trust constituted vide trust deed dated 09.01.2018. The assessee filed an application in Form 10A seeking registration under section