BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur14Chennai8Amritsar6Ahmedabad5Agra4Chandigarh4Mumbai4Bangalore3Delhi3Kolkata2Surat1

Key Topics

Section 14A6Section 143(3)5Section 69B3Section 113Section 683Section 1543Addition to Income3Section 1472Exemption2Disallowance

SRI. M. NAGARAJA,MYSORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 2(1), MYSORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1905/BANG/2019[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Sept 2022AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 1999-2000

For Respondent: Shri S. Parthasarathi
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 139(5)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 154Section 234BSection 263

69B or fair market value of any property referred to in Sub-Section (2) of section 56 is required to be made, the Assessing Officer may require the Valuation Officer to make an estimate of such value and report the same to him. Page 10 of 23 Shri M. Nagaraja, Mysore (2) The Valuation Officer to whom a reference

2

K R PRADEEP,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 417/BANG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Smt. Girija G.P, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Muzaffar Hussain, CIT(DR)
Section 10(34)Section 10(35)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 154Section 250Section 68

charitable trust the purpose for which these currencies were handed over to him. The Ld DR also submitted that the email shared by the assessee as an evidence to explain the source of the currencies seized is dated 17.10.2017, i.e. post the date of search and is merely an afterthought to explain the source. The Ld DR further submitted that

ACIT, MANGALORE vs. M/S ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION,

In the result, the appeals filed by the revenue are allowed

ITA 69/BANG/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 May 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri R.N.Siddappaji, Addl.CIT &For Respondent: Shri P.Dinesh, Advocate
Section 11Section 69Section 69B

Trust (242 ITR 703). The relevant finding of the CIT(A) is as under: 2. Being aggrieved by the above direction, the revenue is in appeal before us in the present appeals raising the following common grounds of appeal: 3. The provisions of section 69B enable the AO in a case where the assessee is unable to offer any satisfactory