DAKSHINA KANNADA NIRMITHI KENDRA ,MANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), MANGALORE
In the result, all these 9 appeals filed by the assessee are allowed
ITA 739/BANG/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Jun 2025AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Keshav Dubey
For Appellant: Shri Ravish Rao, CAFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, Jt.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)
charitable activity but carrying on business. Accordingly benefit of section 11 & 12 was denied and the income of the assessee was assessed as business income. As the turnover of the assessee for this year is approximately Rs.7.5 crores, the ld. AO issued a notice for levy of penalty u/s. 271B of the Act. The ld. AO categorically held that