BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai77Pune21Mumbai13Kolkata10Hyderabad6Indore4Delhi3Panaji3Ahmedabad3Jaipur2Bangalore2Guwahati2Nagpur2Visakhapatnam1Chandigarh1Amritsar1Raipur1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A8Section 2748Section 143(3)6Section 1542Section 1322Section 139(4)2Section 271(1)(c)2Section 246A2Penalty2Addition to Income

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly\nallowed for statistical purposes

ITA 423/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

Charitable Trust v. Dy. CIT\n(280 ITR 357) and held that mixing up of papers with other\npapers are sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.\nThe Madras High Court further observed that the\nexpression \"sufficient cause\" should be interpreted to\nadvance substantial justice. Therefore, advancement of\nsubstantial justice is the prime factor while considering the\nreasons

2
Search & Seizure2

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly\nallowed for statistical purposes

ITA 425/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2024AY 2013-14
For Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 154Section 246ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

Charitable Trust v. Dy. CIT\n(280 ITR 357) and held that mixing up of papers with other\npapers are sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time.\nThe Madras High Court further observed that the\nexpression \"sufficient cause\" should be interpreted to\nadvance substantial justice. Therefore, advancement of\nsubstantial justice is the prime factor while considering the\nreasons