BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 194Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin22Karnataka21Mumbai15Delhi11Kerala5Chennai4Lucknow4Kolkata4Ahmedabad3Bangalore3Indore3Jaipur3Rajasthan2Surat2Rajkot1Telangana1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 105Section 194C5Section 133A2Section 1942TDS2Survey u/s 133A2Condonation of Delay2

SRI. SADGURU EDUCATION TRUST,MADIKERI vs. ITO,

In the result, all the grounds relating to both the appeals are dismissed

ITA 715/BANG/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Jul 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.V Vasudevan, Vice Presidnet & Shri B.R Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri Tata Krishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. P.V Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 10Section 194CSection 2(15)Section 40

Trust [1970] 77 ITR 61 (Mys) has observed as follows at page 615 of the ITR: “It is true that by reason of the Finance Act, 1983, the question as to whether any charitable institution is being run with a profit motive or not has lost its relevant. However, the word “charitable” prefixing the word “institution” has to be given

CHIEF OFFIER,DAVANGERE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 931/BANG/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian S., Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 133ASection 194Section 194C

section 194C and the amount considered by the AO is the year ending figure. We also note that the assessee has filed appeal before CIT(Appeals) much after the due date and the CIT(A) has not condoned the delay stating that there is no reasonable cause set out by the assessee. 8. In case of People Education & Economic Development

CHIEF OFFIER,DAVANGERE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 932/BANG/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian S., Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 133ASection 194Section 194C

section 194C and the amount considered by the AO is the year ending figure. We also note that the assessee has filed appeal before CIT(Appeals) much after the due date and the CIT(A) has not condoned the delay stating that there is no reasonable cause set out by the assessee. 8. In case of People Education & Economic Development