THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MANGALURU vs. M/S. BLUELINE FOODS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,, MANGALURU

Charitable Trust, Mansukhbhai\nK. Shah, with the direction to find valuable articles or things in Indian\nOverseas Bank at different branches. In the said warrant of\nauthorization also, the authorized Officer was directed to enter and\nsearch the building, etc. persons and to seize books of accounts,\ndocuments, money, bullion, jewellery, etc. as are provided under\nsection

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BENGALURU

Charitable Trust by any\nregistered transfer/sale deed. Mr. P Shyamaraju in his sworn statement has\nconfirmed that the properties have been purchased in his name and in name of his\nson (Mr. Umesh S. Raju) in their individual capacities, by utilizing the funds given by\nthe Trust. Mr. P. Shyamaraju has admitted that the titles of said properties and legal

SRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BANGALORE

charitable\ntrust incorporated under section 25 of the companies Act 1956\ncorresponding to section 8 of the companies Act 2013. The assessee\ntrust was granted registration under section 12AA of the Act, which was\nsubsequently migrated to section 12AB of the Act as per the amended\nprovisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2020. The assessee operates\neducational institutions, including schools

AL-BADAR EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,KALABURAGI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARY

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are allowed and the\nappeal of the assessee is dismissed

sections": [ "12A", "133A", "143(1)", "164(2)", "11", "12", "10(23C)(iv)", "12AA", "13(3)", "153A", "153D", "234A", "234B", "234C" ], "issues": "Whether income received as capitation fees by a charitable trust

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BALLARI, BALLARI vs. MS AL BADAR EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST, BALLARI

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are allowed and the\nappeal of the assessee is dismissed

153A", "153D", "234A", "234B", "234C" ], "issues": "Whether unaccounted receipts collected as capitation fees for management seats are eligible for exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act, and if the trust's activities were genuinely charitable

SRI SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BENGALURU

charitable\ntrust incorporated under section 25 of the companies Act 1956\ncorresponding to section 8 of the companies Act 2013. The assessee\ntrust was granted registration under section 12AA of the Act, which was\nsubsequently migrated to section 12AB of the Act as per the amended\nprovisions introduced by the Finance Act, 2020. The assessee operates\neducational institutions, including schools

M/S. SRI. DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES(REGD),KOLAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

M/S. SRI DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES (REGD),KOLAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES, KOLAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BENGALURU vs. SRI DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES, KOLAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES, KOLAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, BENGALURU

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

charitable trust fund for the purchase of property in the name of trustees of huge amount of approx. Rs.115 crores by the then trustees for purchase of property in their own name by utilising the fund of the trust. During the search statement of Mr. M. Vasu, who is the DGM (Finance) confirmed that the property was purchased

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(4), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. SRI DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES (REGD), KOLAR

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

M/S. SRI DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST ,KOLAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(4), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

charitable trust and of\nsection 13(1)(c) of the Act.\n22.1 The learned DR pointed out that section 13(1)(c) of the Act\nspecifically denies the benefit of section 11 of the Act, if any income or\nproperty of the trust is used for the personal benefit of trustees or other\nspecified persons. Since

SRI PRAKASH BHAJANDAS TALREJA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BENGALURU

In the result, ITA Nos.1061, 1062, 1063, 1065 & 1066/Bang/2023 are\npartly allowed and ITA No

153A. Therefore, if the material seized belongs to or pertains to or\nrelates to a person other than the searched person, only then section 153C\ncomes into play. Hence, it is axiomatic to state that if the seized belongs to or\npertains to or relates to some other person, it does belong to or pertain to or\nrelate

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly\nallowed for statistical purposes

section 153A r.w.s 143(3) r.w.s. 153D of\nthe L.T of the Act dated 30.12.2019 and hear the same on merits for the advancement of\nsubstantial cause of justice.\n8.\nIt is humbly submitted that if this application for condonation of delay in filing the\nappeal is not allowed, the appellant would be put to great hardship and irreparable injury

K. P. NANJUNDI VISHWAKARMA,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), BENGALURU

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly\nallowed for statistical purposes

section 153A r.w.s 143(3) r.w.s. 153D of\nthe L.T of the Act dated 30.12.2019 and hear the same on merits for the advancement of\nsubstantial cause of justice.\n8. It is humbly submitted that if this application for condonation of delay in filing the\nappeal is not allowed, the appellant would be put to great hardship and irreparable injury

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(4), BENGALURU vs. SRI ADICHUNCHANAGIRI SHIKHANA TRUST, MANDYA

In the result ITA no.1096/bang/2024 filed by assessee is partly\nallowed and ITA No

Charitable Trust v.\nCIT (Exemptions) Lucknow 2016 (4) TMI 1119 - ITAT\nLucknow / [2016] 49 ITR (Trib) 276 wherein it was held that\neven when the assessee disputed the correctness of the\nstatement recorded u/s.132(4) and wanted to cross-examine,\nthe adjudicating authority did not grant this opportunity to\nthe assessee and held that testimony of witnesses