KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DCIT-(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ii) Out of the remaining accumulated income of Rs. 80,000 for the\nprevious year, a further sum of Rs. 25,000 will get exempted from\npayment of income-tax as per second part of section 11(1)(a). Thus,\nout of the total income derived from property as aforesaid during the\nprevious year, that is, Rs. 1 lakh

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

ii) CMR Education and Consultancy Services The assessment order is perused with care along with the submissions made by the appellant. It is the contention of the appellant that the company MIS CMR Education and Consultancy services The firm provides Value Addition Courses, English language courses, Computer skills, International Programmes, seminars on various, subjects, Fashion Designing, Web hosting and also

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BENGALURU vs. CMR JNANADHARA TRUST, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Waseem Ahmed

ii) CMR Education and Consultancy Services The assessment order is perused with care along with the submissions made by the appellant. It is the contention of the appellant that the company MIS CMR Education and Consultancy services The firm provides Value Addition Courses, English language courses, Computer skills, International Programmes, seminars on various, subjects, Fashion Designing, Web hosting and also

KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DCIT-(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ii) Out of the remaining accumulated income of Rs. 80,000 for the\nprevious year, a further sum of Rs. 25,000 will get exempted from\npayment of income-tax as per second part of section 11(1)(a). Thus,\nout of the total income derived from property as aforesaid during the\nprevious year, that is, Rs. 1 lakh

M/S. ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION,MANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly\nallowed

1) of section 12AA, as the case may be,\nand subsequently,--\na) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has noticed occurrence\nof one or more specified violations during any previous year; or\nb) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has received a reference\nfrom the Assessing Officer under the second proviso to sub-section (3)\nof section 143 for any previous year

M/S. RUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST ,BENGALURU vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BENGALURU

143(3) reference was sent by the AO as per letter\ndated 5.3.2024 for cancellation of registration as under:-\nREFERENCE FOR CANCELLATION OF APPROVAL GRANTED U/S 12A IN THE CASE OF M/S\nRUKMINI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST FOR THE AY 2019-20\n1. Introduction\n1.1 The Assessee Trust, Rukmini Educational Charitable Society founded in 2003 is a charitable\ntrust engaged

M/S. VIJAYANAGAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BENGALURU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), BENGALURU

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2019-20

charitable and activities are carried out as per objects of the trust, there cannot be any reason for the cancellation of the registration because section 13(1) of the Act applies to it. To support his contention, he relied upon the decision of Krupanidhi Educational Trust v. DIT [2012] 27 taxmann.com 11 [Bang], Cancer Aid & Research Foundation

SHRI HINGULAMBIKA EDUCATION SOCIETY,GULBARGA vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), WARD-1, KALBURGI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2020-21

ii) With effect from the Assessment Year 2009-10, the advancement of any object of general public utility other than relief of the poor, education and medical relief as defined in section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act shall not be a charitable purpose, if it involves the carrying on of any activity in the nature of trade, commerce

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARI vs. M/S. NAVODAYA EDUCATION TRUST, RAICHUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2009-10

charitable or religious trust or institution that has been registered u/s 12A), Form 10BB (Audit report under section 10(23C) of the Act) and the Form 3CD. The afore-mentioned facts were also brought under the order of the CIT(A). The assessee is claiming exemptions available to both 10(23C)(vi) and 12A registered entities and moreover the assessee

NAVODAYA EDUCATION TRUST,RAICHUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, BELLARY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2015-16

Charitable Foundation [1987] 164 ITR 439 (Raj), Padanilam Welfare Commissioner Trust v DCIT Chennai ITA No 444/Mds/ 2010, as well as CIT v Institute of Banking Personnel [2003] 131 taxmann 386 (BOM). 15. The CIT (Appeals) however, dismissed the appeal on both the grounds vide his impugned order observing as follows:- "the adjustment has been made

M/S. ADARSH VIDYA KENDRA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL , BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

1) of section 12AA, as the case may be, and\nsubsequently,--\na) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has noticed occurrence\nof one or more specified violations during any previous year; or\nb) The Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has received a reference\nfrom the Assessing Officer under the second proviso to sub-section (3) of\nsection 143 for any previous year

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MANGALURU vs. M/S. BLUELINE FOODS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,, MANGALURU

ii) (pages 151\nto 152);\niii. Statements recorded under sections 131, 131A and 133A(3)(iii) from\nvarious persons (as opposed to statements recorded under section\n132(4) (pages 153 to 175)\niv. The summons issued to the Appellant by the Authorized Officer under\nsection 131 of the Act (page 176); and\nv. Repeated references by the learned

DODDABALLAPUR PLANNING AUTHORITY,BANGALORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION, WARD-3, BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubey

Trust and has claimed exemption at Rs.5,80,44,590/- under section 11(1) of the Act and this amount has been disallowed as the appellant assessee failed to file Form 9A within the due date. (ii) Section 11(1) explicitly mandates the filing of Form 9A for the accumulation of income for the charitable purpose to ensure transparency

M/S. ARHAM MITRA MANDAL,BANGALORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS)-WARD-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Charitable Trust registered under section 12A of the\nAct w.e.f. 28.02.2002. Assessee is helping the poor by providing food, conducting\nmedical / health camps, etc. For the Assessment Year 2018-19, the assessee Trust\nhad filed the return of income on 28.09.2018 by declaring ‘Nil' income, after\nclaiming exemption under section 11 of the Act for Rs.42,690,910/- (including\nRs.8

KARNATAKA CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,BENGALURU vs. DCIT-(EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessmentyear:2016-17

ii)the accounts of the trust or institution for that year have been audited by an accountant defined in the Explanation below sub-section (2) of section 288 before the specified date referred to in section 44AB and the person in receipt of the income furnishes by that date the report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed

M/S NAVODAYA GRAMA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST ,MANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1 , MANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

trust would never come to the notice of the Assessing Officer. Therefore as per the provisions of Section 147 Expln. 1, the income has escaped assessment within the meaning of the section. He drew our attention to the Expln. 1 of Section 147 of the Act and supported the orders of CIT (Appeals). 6. We have heard both the parties

M/S.NAVODAYA GRAMA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST ,MANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) CIRCLE-1 , , MANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

trust would never come to the notice of the Assessing Officer. Therefore as per the provisions of Section 147 Expln. 1, the income has escaped assessment within the meaning of the section. He drew our attention to the Expln. 1 of Section 147 of the Act and supported the orders of CIT (Appeals). 6. We have heard both the parties

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S B S & G FOUNDATION,, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for asst

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boazthe Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru. . Appellant Vs. M/S B S & G Foundation, 502, 2Nd Floor, 5Th ‘C’ Main, 5Th Cross, 2Nd Block, Hrbr Layout, Kalyannagar, Bangalore. . Respondent Pan – Aaatb6131D. Appellant By : Smt. Padmameenakshhi, Jcit Respondent By : Shri R.T Balasubramanyam, C.A Date Of Hearing : 28-9-2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 4-10-2017 O R D E R

143(3) of the Act vide order dated 11.03.2014; wherein the Assessing Officer (i) restricted the accumulation u/s 11 of the Act upto the extent of 15% of net receipts only; (ii) disallowed depreciation claimed on fixed assets and (iii) did not allow the assessee’s claiming for carry forward of excess application of income for set off as application