BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 9(1)(vb)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh48Delhi6Bangalore3Mumbai2Surat2Kolkata1Hyderabad1Ahmedabad1Patna1SC1

Key Topics

Section 115J6Deduction3Addition to Income3Section 143(3)2

M/S STAR METALLICS & POWER PVT LTD ,HOSPET vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1 , BELLARY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2181/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Nov 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariandshri George George Kassessment Year : 2013-14

For Appellant: Smt. Prathibha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Besaganni, JCIT (DR)

vb) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (iiib) of section 28;] [(vc) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (iiic) of section 28;] [(vd)] the value of any benefit or perquisite taxable under clause (iv) of section 28; [(ve) any sum chargeable to income-tax under clause (v) of section 28;] (vi) any capital gains chargeable under

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S THE VYSYA BANK LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the grounds of appeal of the assessee remanded by the High Court for fresh consideration are allowed

ITA 733/BANG/2011[2001-02]Status: Disposed
ITAT Bangalore
03 Jan 2022
AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevanand Shri B. R. Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sumeer Singh Meena, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115JSection 143(3)

section 115JB of the Act. While computing the total income of the assessee as per the normal provisions of the Act, the AO made several additions to the total income declared by the assessee. Against those additions, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and by order dated 19.05.2011, the CIT(A) deleted certain additions made

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED (AS SUCCESSOR IN BUSINESS OF ERSTWHILE ING VYSYA BANK LIMITED),BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-I, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the grounds of appeal of the assessee remanded by the High Court for fresh consideration are allowed

ITA 748/BANG/2011[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Jan 2022AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevanand Shri B. R. Baskaran

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sumeer Singh Meena, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 115JSection 143(3)

section 115JB of the Act. While computing the total income of the assessee as per the normal provisions of the Act, the AO made several additions to the total income declared by the assessee. Against those additions, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and by order dated 19.05.2011, the CIT(A) deleted certain additions made