BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai87Chandigarh58Delhi52Ahmedabad29Jaipur27Raipur22Kolkata16Indore14Chennai14Hyderabad9Lucknow7Pune4Surat4Amritsar3Jodhpur3Bangalore3Cuttack2Nagpur2Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)3Addition to Income3Section 143(1)2Section 282Section 1482Section 80P(2)(d)2Disallowance2

DB ENGINEERING & CONSULTING GMBH,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, , BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1377/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav & It(It)A No.1377/Bang/2024 Assessment Year : 2020-21 M/S. Db Engineering & Consulting Gmbh, Dcit (International 82/4, 3Rd Floor, North Wing, Hulkul Brigade Taxation), Centre, Lavelle Road, Ward No.76, Vs. Circle – 1(1), Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Pan :Aaecd 9085 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Susan Mathew, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 25.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.11.2024

For Appellant: Smt. Susan Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 111ASection 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

36(1)(va) of the Act towards belated remittance of employees’ contribution towards PF and the CPC applied surcharge @ 5% instead of 2% as computed by the assessee. 3. Aggrieved from the above Order of the CPC, the assessee field an appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A), after considering the entire submissions, dismissed the appeal of the assessee

METAL CLOSURES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 4(1)(2), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is treated as allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 941/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Prakash Chand Yadavassessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Sri R.E. Balasubramanyam, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Subramanian S., D.R
Section 148Section 28Section 36(2)(i)

36(1)(iii) of the Act. It was noted by the lower authorities that no such deduction to be allowed unless it has been taken only while computing income of the assessee in the previous year in which the amount of such debt or part there of is written off or of an earlier previous year, or represent money lent

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(2)(1), BENGALURU, BENGALURU vs. M/S. BANGALORE CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, BENGALURU

In the result both the appeals of the Revenue as well as\nCos of the Assessee for the Asst

ITA 2347/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Jun 2025AY 2018-19
Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

Va Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Limited. Sirsi in ITA No. 100066 of\n2016 dated 16.06.2017, wherein it was held that the income by way of interest earned\nfrom deposits and investments of surplus funds does not change its character\nirrespective of whether such interest is earned from the scheduled banks or the co-\noperative banks and thus clause