BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9Jaipur9Hyderabad7Delhi6Bangalore5Kolkata4Indore4Chennai3Chandigarh3Lucknow3Ahmedabad2Cochin1Amritsar1Patna1Pune1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 271D10Section 1948Section 12A8Section 269S6Section 2015Section 271E5Section 201(1)4Section 2633Penalty3Exemption

M/S PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-18(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 813/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore02 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan, Vp & Shri Chandra Poojari, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Padamchand Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Smt.R.Premi, JCIT-DR
Section 191Section 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206ASection 4

269T of the Act also supports the proposition that the amount of deposit is repayable on demand. The definition reads as follows: “"loan or deposit" means any loan or deposit of money which is repayable after notice or repayable after a period and, in the case of a person other than a company, includes loan or deposit of any nature

2
Addition to Income2

MFAR HOLDINGS PVT. LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. PR. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 634/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. N. V. Vasudevan & Shri. Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri. Cherian K Baby, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Sunil Kumar Agarwala, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 269Section 271DSection 45(2)

Section 269 SS and 269T of the Act. As per the Pr. CIT, AO ought to have ITA.634/Bang/2015 Page - 3 initiated penalty proceedings u/s.271D and 271E of the Act, which he failed to do. 05. To this show-cause notice, assessee filed a detailed reply. On the first issue reply of the assessee was that it was in the business

SRI. GANGASHARA SHETTY, ,DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), MANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1633/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Padmavathy S. & Shri Prakash Chand Yadavassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Smt. Sunaiana Bhatia, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, D.R
Section 147Section 269SSection 271DSection 273BSection 54

capital gain (LTCG) u/s 54 of the Act as he has utilized the amount of gain in construction of one residential house. Thereafter, the reassessment proceedings were completed at the returned income. However, it has been noticed by the AO that the assessee has received an amount of Rs.6 lakhs in cash while entering into the transaction of sale

M/S. SRI. SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 835/BANG/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Mar 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Years : 2021-22

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Mehta, CA & Shri Mahesh KumarFor Respondent: Shri Jeetendra Kumar, CIT (DR)
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)

269T of the Act. 9. Consequently, as per the provisions of the second proviso to section 143(3) of the Act, the AO made a reference to the learned . Page 4 of 16 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) on March 6, 2023, recommending the withdrawal of registration granted under section 12AA/12AB of the Act. 10. Based

SMT SAVITA S GONGADSHETT ,BAGALKOT vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VIJAYAPUR RANGE , VIJAYAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 116/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Jan 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R.Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita No.116(Bang)/2019 (Assessment Year : 2014-15) Smt.Savita S Gangadshetti, Gorbal Naka, At Ilkal, Tal. Hungund, Bagalkot Dist. Pan No.Aclpg6870B Appellant Vs The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vijayapur Range, Vijayapur. Respondent Appellant By : Shri B.S.Balachandran, Advocate Revenue By : Shri M. Vijaykumar, Addl.Cit

For Appellant: Shri B.S.Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M. Vijaykumar, Addl.CIT
Section 269SSection 269TSection 271DSection 271E

269T shall attract penalty provisions of sec. 271D & 271E of the Act. Accordingly, he levied penalty of Rs.12.50 lakhs each both u/s 271D & u/s 271E of the IT Act, 1961. 3. The ld.CIT(A) agreed with the view of Ld JCIT that these are loan transactions only. The Ld CIT(A) deleted the penalty levied u/s 271D