BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 246Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai34Indore32Pune17Panaji13Chandigarh12Mumbai12Delhi11Jaipur10Kolkata6Hyderabad6Ahmedabad5Bangalore4Jodhpur3Agra2Raipur2Visakhapatnam1Rajkot1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 143(2)3Section 115J3Disallowance3Section 139(1)2

ALOK KUMAR JAIN,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 439/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Balaji V., CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, Jt.CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 246A

246A of the Act and not for condonation of delay in filing of Form 67. The decision sought by the Appellant from the Ld. ADDL/JCIT(A) was: • Whether FTC can be denied for delay in filing of Form 67 beyond the due date of filing of Return of Income under Section 139(1) of the Act, in view of several

KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(3)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2019-20 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2219/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri A.C. Raju, CAFor Respondent: Shri Netrapal M.S., Addl.CIT (DR)
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital gain. The above amount has also been taxed by the ld. AO in the tax computation sheet. As the assessee found that it is an error on the part of the assessee as well as on the part of the AO in offering the above amount and taxing the above amount respectively, despite statutory provisions exempting it. The assessee

KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2019-20 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2220/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri A.C. Raju, CAFor Respondent: Shri Netrapal M.S., Addl.CIT (DR)
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital gain. The above amount has also been taxed by the ld. AO in the tax computation sheet. As the assessee found that it is an error on the part of the assessee as well as on the part of the AO in offering the above amount and taxing the above amount respectively, despite statutory provisions exempting it. The assessee

KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(3)(1), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for AY 2019-20 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2221/BANG/2024[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jan 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Soundararajan K.

For Appellant: Shri A.C. Raju, CAFor Respondent: Shri Netrapal M.S., Addl.CIT (DR)
Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)

capital gain. The above amount has also been taxed by the ld. AO in the tax computation sheet. As the assessee found that it is an error on the part of the assessee as well as on the part of the AO in offering the above amount and taxing the above amount respectively, despite statutory provisions exempting it. The assessee