BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “capital gains”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai66Bangalore14Kolkata11Mumbai6Delhi5Jodhpur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 234E95Section 200A91TDS14Section 2346Section 683Section 246A3Capital Gains3Penalty3Section 1542Section 200A(1)(c)2Section 200(1)2Reopening of Assessment2

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1490/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1485/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1486/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1487/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1488/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1489/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL-TDS , UTTARA PRADESH

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1482/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL-TDS ,, UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1483/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(4), UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1484/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

VEENA SOMANI ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 2822/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200(1)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

VEENA SOMANI ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 2823/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200(1)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

capital gains in the return, the assessee sought to file appeal against the same belatedly, based on a High Court decision rendered later. However, in the case on hand, the levy of late fee under section 234E

YESHWANTHRAJ RANKA,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- 7, BANGALORE

In the result, these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1842/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jun 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri. S. Vimal Chand Dhariwall, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. N. Dhandapani, Addl. CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 68

capital gains be accepted. The assessment of the amount U/s.68 be deleted and the interest also to be deleted, 3. In the course of hearing, it was submitted by learned AR of the assessee that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal order rendered in the case of Sibia Healthcare

YESHWANTHRAJ RANKA,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- 7, BANGALORE

In the result, these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1843/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri. S. Vimal Chand Dhariwall, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. N. Dhandapani, Addl. CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 68

capital gains be accepted. The assessment of the amount U/s.68 be deleted and the interest also to be deleted, 3. In the course of hearing, it was submitted by learned AR of the assessee that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal order rendered in the case of Sibia Healthcare

YESHWANTHRAJ RANKA,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)- 7, BANGALORE

In the result, these three appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1844/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Jun 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri. S. Vimal Chand Dhariwall, CAFor Respondent: Shri. K. N. Dhandapani, Addl. CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 246ASection 68

capital gains be accepted. The assessment of the amount U/s.68 be deleted and the interest also to be deleted, 3. In the course of hearing, it was submitted by learned AR of the assessee that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal order rendered in the case of Sibia Healthcare