BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

129 results for “capital gains”+ Section 2(290)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai462Delhi373Bangalore129Jaipur112Karnataka109Kolkata91Chennai77Chandigarh71Ahmedabad57Hyderabad46Indore44Pune34Raipur26Surat21Calcutta17Nagpur15Cochin13Lucknow11Rajkot11Amritsar9Visakhapatnam8SC6Jodhpur5Telangana4Jabalpur3Guwahati3Rajasthan2Patna1Andhra Pradesh1Agra1

Key Topics

Addition to Income53Disallowance44Section 143(3)42Section 10A36Section 4034Section 153A33Section 133A33Section 153C30Deduction29

LATE SMT.K.LEELAVATHY, BY L/R SHRI M.THIMMEGOWDA ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 755/BANG/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Bharath L, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 153CSection 2(14)(iii)

section 153C are bad in law. Reliance is placed on the following rulings:- a. CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (84 taxmann.com 290); b. CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (62 taxmann.com 391) (Del); c. CIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (69 taxmann.com 108) (Kar); d. CIT v. Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd. (73 taxmann.com 149)(Kar); e. Pr. CIT v. Allied Perfumers

LATE SMT.K.LEELAVATHY BY L/R SHRI M.THIMMEGOWDA ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

Showing 1–20 of 129 · Page 1 of 7

Section 14827
Section 13226
Transfer Pricing21

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 754/BANG/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Bharath L, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 153CSection 2(14)(iii)

section 153C are bad in law. Reliance is placed on the following rulings:- a. CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (84 taxmann.com 290); b. CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (62 taxmann.com 391) (Del); c. CIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (69 taxmann.com 108) (Kar); d. CIT v. Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd. (73 taxmann.com 149)(Kar); e. Pr. CIT v. Allied Perfumers

LATE SMT.K>LEELAVATHY BY L/R SHRI.M.THIMMEGOWDA ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 753/BANG/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Bharath L, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 153CSection 2(14)(iii)

section 153C are bad in law. Reliance is placed on the following rulings:- a. CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (84 taxmann.com 290); b. CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (62 taxmann.com 391) (Del); c. CIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (69 taxmann.com 108) (Kar); d. CIT v. Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd. (73 taxmann.com 149)(Kar); e. Pr. CIT v. Allied Perfumers

LATE SMT.K.LEELAVATHY BY L/R SHRI M.THIMMEGOWDA ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 752/BANG/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Apr 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Bharath L, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 153CSection 2(14)(iii)

section 153C are bad in law. Reliance is placed on the following rulings:- a. CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society (84 taxmann.com 290); b. CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (62 taxmann.com 391) (Del); c. CIT v. IBC Knowledge Park (69 taxmann.com 108) (Kar); d. CIT v. Veerprabhu Marketing Ltd. (73 taxmann.com 149)(Kar); e. Pr. CIT v. Allied Perfumers

SRI ALAGAPPA ANNAMALAI(HUF),BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

ITA 776/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.Sri Alagappa Muthiah (Huf) 34, 8Th Main, 4Th Cross Rajamahal Vilas Extension Bangalore 560 080 Pan No: Aaaha3885P Appellant

Section 131

290 17,49,200 17,49,200 40,000 40,000 Survey charges Evaluation and speculation of JD JD Agreement Design and inspection 11,251 1,05,150 45,00,000 5,61,800 [C] 1,12,92,691 Total Long Term Capital Gains 1/2 Share of assessee in Total Long Term Capital Gains

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), BENGALURU vs. ALAGAPPA ANNAMALAI (HUF), BENGALURU

ITA 955/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.Sri Alagappa Muthiah (Huf) 34, 8Th Main, 4Th Cross Rajamahal Vilas Extension Bangalore 560 080 Pan No : Aaана3885P Appellant

Section 131

290 17,49,200 17,49,200 40,000 40,000 ITA Nos.775 & 954/Bang/2024 Sri Alagappa Muthiah (HUF), Bangalore ITA Nos.776 & 955/Bang/2024 Sri Alagappa Annamalai (HUF), Bangalore Page 6 of 34 Survey charges Evaluation and speculation of JD JD Agreement Design and inspection

SRI ALAGAPPA MUTHIAH(HUF),BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(4), BANGALORE

ITA 775/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Soundararajan K.Sri Alagappa Muthiah (Huf) 34, 8Th Main, 4Th Cross Rajamahal Vilas Extension Bangalore 560 080 Pan No: Aaана3885P Appellant

Section 131

290 17,49,200 40,000 Survey charges Evaluation and speculation of JD JD Agreement Design and inspection 11,251 1,05,150 45,00,000 5,61,800 11,251 1,05,150 45,00,000 5,61,800 [C] 1,12,92,691 1,12,92,691 Total Long Term Capital Gains 1/2 Share of assessee in Total

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 22/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. A. Shankar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. M. Mahesh, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) NA of the Act expired on 31.03.2017 c. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys. 2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 21/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. A. Shankar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. M. Mahesh, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) NA of the Act expired on 31.03.2017 c. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys. 2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 24/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. A. Shankar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. M. Mahesh, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) NA of the Act expired on 31.03.2017 c. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys. 2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys. 2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), BENGALURU

ITA 23/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) | of the Act expired on | 31.03.2017 | NA C. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys.2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys.2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

M/S. IBM INDIA PVT. LTD.,,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-4(1)(2), BENGALURU

In the result appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 725/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jul 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. B. R. Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate along with Ajay Roti, C.AFor Respondent: Shri K.V Arvind, Advocate
Section 10ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 92C

290/- and claimed deduction under section 10AA amounting to Rs.303,16,58,824,. Ld.AO noted that assessee computed MAT u/s.115JB, payable at Rs.363,67,96,390/-. 2.1 Ld.AO passed draft assessment order making various additions under Transfer Pricing issue as proposed by Ld.TPO and corporate tax issues in the hands of assessee. IT(TP)A No.725/Bang/2018 Asst.Yr

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) , BENGALURU

ITA 26/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri. A. Shankar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. M. Mahesh, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) of the Act expired on 31.03.2017 NA C. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys.2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys.2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

M/S. BARBEQUE NATION HOSPITALITY LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2) , BENGALURU

ITA 25/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Keshav Dubey

For Respondent: Shri. A. Shankar, Sr. Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 234ASection 250

2) of the Act expired on 31.03.2017 | NA C. It can be seen from the above, that the A.Ys.2013-14 to 2016-17 are unabated assessment years for the purpose of proceedings under section 153A of the Act. Further, for the A.Ys.2013-14 and 2015-16, the department had initiated proceedings under section

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S K. MOHAN & COMPANY (EXPORTS) PVT. LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, ITA 1057/B/12 is partly allowed and ITA 1103/B/12 is dismissed

ITA 1103/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Apr 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 10BSection 10B(3)

capital loan, the assessee had to enter into a currency swap arrangement. The ITA Nos. 1093/B0/09, 1266/B/10 & 1057 & 1103/B/12 Page 8 of 50 assessee entered into currency swap transaction in respect of outstanding foreign currency loans as per the prevailing RBI guidelines. The currency swap transaction on settlement resulted in a loss of Rs.6.05 crores. The question before the Tribunal

M/S K. MOHAN & COMPANY (EXPORTS) PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, ITA 1057/B/12 is partly allowed and ITA 1103/B/12 is dismissed

ITA 1057/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Apr 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 10BSection 10B(3)

capital loan, the assessee had to enter into a currency swap arrangement. The ITA Nos. 1093/B0/09, 1266/B/10 & 1057 & 1103/B/12 Page 8 of 50 assessee entered into currency swap transaction in respect of outstanding foreign currency loans as per the prevailing RBI guidelines. The currency swap transaction on settlement resulted in a loss of Rs.6.05 crores. The question before the Tribunal

M/S. K. MOHAN & COMPANY (EXPORTS) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, ITA 1057/B/12 is partly allowed and ITA 1103/B/12 is dismissed

ITA 1266/BANG/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Apr 2015AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 10BSection 10B(3)

capital loan, the assessee had to enter into a currency swap arrangement. The ITA Nos. 1093/B0/09, 1266/B/10 & 1057 & 1103/B/12 Page 8 of 50 assessee entered into currency swap transaction in respect of outstanding foreign currency loans as per the prevailing RBI guidelines. The currency swap transaction on settlement resulted in a loss of Rs.6.05 crores. The question before the Tribunal

M/S K. MOHAN & COMPNAY (EXPORTS) PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

In the result, ITA 1057/B/12 is partly allowed and ITA 1103/B/12 is dismissed

ITA 1093/BANG/2009[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Apr 2015AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boaz

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P. Dhivahar, Jt. CIT(DR)
Section 10BSection 10B(3)

capital loan, the assessee had to enter into a currency swap arrangement. The ITA Nos. 1093/B0/09, 1266/B/10 & 1057 & 1103/B/12 Page 8 of 50 assessee entered into currency swap transaction in respect of outstanding foreign currency loans as per the prevailing RBI guidelines. The currency swap transaction on settlement resulted in a loss of Rs.6.05 crores. The question before the Tribunal

M/S. S I MEDIA LLP, ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result appeal of the assessee allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 78/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Soundararajan Kassessment Year: 2021-22

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subramanian S, JCIT (DR)

290 days in filing the appeal. Accordingly, we proceed to adjudicate the matter on merits. 5. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the disallowance of the indexed cost of interest of ₹2,51,20,901 claimed on the borrowed money utilized for acquiring the capital asset against the capital gain

SRI NEKKUNDI MUNIREDDY THULASIRAM,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 4(3)(1), BANGALORE

ITA 985/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N V Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodiaassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT)
Section 48Section 54

capital gain on sale of the flat has to be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 48 of the Act. The facts which we notice in this regard from the statements filed by the assessee before the CIT(Appeals) is that the flat which was sold by the assessee during the previous year was acquired by the assessee