BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 1Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi15Mumbai10Chennai8Bangalore3Telangana2Hyderabad2Indore2Kolkata1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Transfer Pricing3Addition to Income3Comparables/TP3Section 102

ACUSIS SOFTWARE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed in

ITA 1232/BANG/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Oct 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.K.Yadav & Shri A. K. Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Chavali Narayan, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT
Section 10Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 1OSection 253

Section 1O A of the Act. 3.On the facts and I the circumstances of the case and in law, based on the directions of the DRP, the ld. AO has erred in law by no considering that, if the telecommunication expenses (i.e. internet and ISDN service charge) and foreign currency expenses are reduced from export turnover, an equal amount should

M/S TYCO ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal being IT(TP)A No

ITA 1251/BANG/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Feb 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri A.K.Garodia

For Appellant: Shri Sumeet Khurana, CAFor Respondent: Ms.Neera Malhotra, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

1o. That the learned Assessing Officer erred in disallowing expenses accrued towards repairs and maintenance of Rs 101,200, product testing fees of Rs 200,000 and foreign travel expenses of Rs453,359 on the ground that they are unknown liabilities recognized on a provisional basis. 11. (a) That the learned Assessing Officer erred in stating that the Company

M/S I2 TECHNOLGOIES SOFTWARE PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)IV, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical

ITA 1207/BANG/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Apr 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri A. K. Garodia & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Arvind Sonde, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G.R.Reddy, CIT –I
Section 92C

capital adjustment for the comparable companies selected by the appellant. 2h) the appellant retains the right to have the benefit of applying the range of +/-5% in determination of the arm’s length price. 3. The ld. CI(A) has ignored the ground raised by the appellant with respect to turnover filter and has held that companies with more than