DR. VIJAYALAKSHMI L ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(3), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 571/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jun 2024AY 2020-21
Bench: Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2020-21 Dr. Vijayalakshmi L, No. 730/D, “Sireesha”, The Income Tax 9Th Cross, 4Th Main, Officer, M C Layout, Ward – 2(2)(3), Vijayanagar, Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 040. Vs. Pan: Acjpv2022J Appellant Respondent
For Appellant: Shri Tharun Kothari, CA
Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234BSection 250
gains were 6,01,261). The learned CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the data entered in the form was accurate and the processing has been made erroneously and the adjustment ought to have been deleted in full, on the facts and circumstances of the case.
8. The Appellant denies the liability to pay interest under section 234B
