BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 115Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai63Delhi6Bangalore3Pune2SC2Karnataka1Chennai1Ahmedabad1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 2634Section 143(3)3Section 115B3Section 443Set Off of Losses3

EXIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 792/BANG/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. S. Jayaraman

For Appellant: Shri. T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Sanjay Kumar, CIT
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263

Capital gains or Income from other sources. Being non-obstante clause, sec. 44 mandates that the profits and ITA.792/Bang/2016 Page - 8 gains of insurance business shall be computed in accordance with the rules contained in First Schedule. Therefore, the incomes in Share-holders' account are to be taxed as part of life insurance business only, as they are part

PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. PR. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 756/BANG/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Abraham P. George

For Appellant: Shri. K. P. Kumar, Senior CounselFor Respondent: Shri. G. R. Reddy, CIT – DR-I
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 263Section 27ASection 44

gains arising to an insurance company from shareholders account and policy holders account. Only relationship between these two, as per the Ld. AR was the requirement to replenish the deficit in policy holders account from the shareholders ITA.756/Bang/2015 Page - 7 account. IRDA regulations mandated separation of accounts so as to ensure safety of the policy holders money. Thus there

PNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. CIT, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed”

ITA 1508/BANG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Sept 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. Asha Vijayaraghavanshri S Jayaramanthe Pnb Metlife India Insurance Co. Ltd.., No.5, Brigade Seshmahal, Vani Vilas Road, Basavangudi, Bangalore. . Appellant Vs. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-5, Bangalore. . Respondent Appellant By : Shri Kp Kumar, Sr. Counsel Respondent By : Shri Gr Reddy, Cit

For Appellant: Shri KP Kumar, Sr. CounselFor Respondent: Shri GR Reddy, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 44Section 71

115B of the Act, could be given only to the profits from life-insurance business, there is no dispute that assessee was doing only life-insurance business as regulated by the IRDA. CIT himself has mentioned that assessee was engaged in life- insurance business. Question whether policy holders account and shareholders account, in the case of an assessee carrying