BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “capital gains”+ Section 111Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai194Delhi43Kolkata27Bangalore13Chennai12Ahmedabad11Pune10Indore9Hyderabad6Jaipur5Surat4Nagpur3Rajkot2Telangana1Karnataka1Lucknow1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 1489Section 80G8Section 10A8Deduction7Capital Gains7Section 143(1)6Addition to Income6Short Term Capital Gains

DIVYA DINESH ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2194/BANG/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Sudheendra B.R, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT
Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80G

gains are taxable at a different rate. The rate of tax is governed by section 111A or section 112 or section 112A of the Act, but the mechanism of set off is governed independently by section 70 of the Act. These operate in different fields. Once the income falls under the head “Capital

6
Section 111A5
Section 1475
Business Income5

DIVYA DINESH ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2195/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2026AY 2021-22
Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80G

gains are taxable at a different\nrate. The rate of tax is governed by section 111A or section 112 or\nsection 112A of the Act, but the mechanism of set off is governed\nindependently by section 70 of the Act. These operate in different fields.\nOnce the income falls under the head “Capital

SHRI. SRIRAM RUPANAGUNTA,BANGALORE vs. ASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-5(3)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 31/BANG/2023[2015-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 May 2023AY 2015-15

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Sriram Rupanagunta, The Assistant 34 Purva Park Ridge, Commissioner Of Goshala Road, Income Tax, Garudachar Palya, Circle – 5(3)(2), Bangalore – 560 048. Vs. Banglore. Pan: Ahlpr7578N Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kodhanda Pani, Ca : Shri Kiran .D, Addl. Cit Revenue By (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 13-04-2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 18-05-2023 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 24.11.2022 Passed By Nfac For Assessment Year 2015-16 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Ld.Assessing Officer Erred In Passing The Assessment Order In The Manner In Which It Is Done On The Basis Of Presumptions, Assumptions & Surmises & Inferences, Conjecture & Hypothetical, Than On The Basis Of The Facts.

For Appellant: Shri Kodhanda Pani, CA
Section 111ASection 143Section 2Section 2(14)Section 2(47)Section 234Section 47Section 54E

111A of IT Act. 10. The Ld Assessing Officer erred in relying on the case law Shri Muthuswamy Ravikumar Vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax. ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal), the facts of which are nor relevant in the said case for the said AY 2015-16 and hence misplaced. The facts in the said case related to beneficial

R V DESHPANDE HUF,BANGALORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE-1, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 340/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri S V Ravishankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V S Chakrapani, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263

Section 263 was held invalid. Held in the following cases. i. Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd. v. ACIT [2012] 19 ITR 746 (Mum.)(Trib). ii. Roshan Lal Vegetable Products (P) Ltd. v. ITO, 51 SOT 1 (URO) (Asr.)(Trib.) iii. Antala Sanjaykumar Ravjibhai v. CIT [2012] 135 ITD 506 (Rajkot) (Trib.) 9. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax erred in arriving

ITO, BANGALORE vs. M/S KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 922/BANG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Apr 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Inturi Rama Raoi.T.A No.922/Bang/2014 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Income-Tax Officer, Ward – 6(2), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. M/S. Karnataka State Co-Operative Federation Ltd, No.32, 3Rd Floor, D. Devraj Urs Road, Race Course Road, Bengaluru 560 001 .. Respondent Pan : Aaajk0471H Assessee By : Shri. Sandeep, Ca Revenue By : Shri. P. Dhivahar, Jcit Heard On : 05.04.2016 Pronounced On : 2904.2016 O R D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep, CAFor Respondent: Shri. P. Dhivahar, JCIT
Section 10Section 143(1)(a)

capital gain is to be taxed at special rate under section 111A of the Act, i.e., internal page 19 of the return

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, BANGALORE vs. THE KARNATAKA STATE CO.OP.APEX BANK LTD, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1309/BANG/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Apr 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Inturi Rama Raoi.T.A No.922/Bang/2014 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Income-Tax Officer, Ward – 6(2), Bengaluru .. Appellant V. M/S. Karnataka State Co-Operative Federation Ltd, No.32, 3Rd Floor, D. Devraj Urs Road, Race Course Road, Bengaluru 560 001 .. Respondent Pan : Aaajk0471H Assessee By : Shri. Sandeep, Ca Revenue By : Shri. P. Dhivahar, Jcit Heard On : 05.04.2016 Pronounced On : 2904.2016 O R D E R Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Appellant: Shri. Sandeep, CAFor Respondent: Shri. P. Dhivahar, JCIT
Section 10Section 143(1)(a)

capital gain is to be taxed at special rate under section 111A of the Act, i.e., internal page 19 of the return

M/S. MOLECULAR CONNECTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(OSD), CIRCLE - 4(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 156/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri K. Sheshadri, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh K., DR
Section 111ASection 143(2)Section 14A

capital gains of Rs.1,51,19,291/- from debt mutual funds at special tax rates u/s Page 3 of 10 111A of the Act. Special tax rate of 15% as per section

DB ENGINEERING & CONSULTING GMBH,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, , BENGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1377/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore19 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav & It(It)A No.1377/Bang/2024 Assessment Year : 2020-21 M/S. Db Engineering & Consulting Gmbh, Dcit (International 82/4, 3Rd Floor, North Wing, Hulkul Brigade Taxation), Centre, Lavelle Road, Ward No.76, Vs. Circle – 1(1), Bangalore – 560 001. Bangalore. Pan :Aaecd 9085 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Smt. Susan Mathew, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 25.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.11.2024

For Appellant: Smt. Susan Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 111ASection 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

section 111A being tax on short term capital gains or under sections 112 or 112A being tax on long term

SNEHALATHA SINGHI ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1175/BANG/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Apr 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Respondent: Shri K R Pradeep, Advocate &
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 68Section 69C

section 68 of the Act. 20. That the Authorities below erred in refusing to apply the beneficial treatment provided under the Act of the Capital gains earned by the assessee from the transfer of shares in M/s. Blue Circle Services Ltd. 21. That the Authorities below erred in making addition of Rs.49,54,368/- as Unexplained Expenditure

ACIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S ICICI EMERGING SECTOR FUND,, BANGALORE

In the result, all the thirteen appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 505/BANG/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri A.K.Garodia, Accounant Member

For Appellant: Shri S.E.Dastur, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Neera Malhotra, CIT &
Section 199

capital gains on sale of mutual fund units at 10 per cent. which is the rate as per the provisions of section 111A

PRACTO TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3), BENGALURU, BANGALORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 311/BANG/2024[AY 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2025

Bench: SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member), SHRI KESHAV DUBEY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 144C(10)Section 144C(5)Section 147Section 148Section 153

capital gain income of Rs. 37,28,537/- on sale of sale of equity share / unit of equity oriented Mutual Fund under section 111A

M/S NEOBYTES SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 353/BANG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N V Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodiaassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Prashanth G.S., CAFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 10ASection 111ASection 143

capital gains as per section 111A of the Act at Rs. 42,17,773. Page 2 of 6 3. The appellant

RAHUL AGARWAL ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(1) , BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed as above

ITA 765/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Bharadwaj Sheshadri, Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Senthil Kumar N., CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 10(35)Section 111ASection 133ASection 143(3)Section 144C(15)(b)Section 147Section 148Section 148A

section 111A of Rs. 13,84,865. 8. The addition of Rs. 1,36,96,832 ought to be deleted as the 52,19,475 DRP/ AO relied exclusively on the survey report of another entity, a copy of which was not furnished to the Appellant in violation of the principles of natural justice, and the nexus and relevance