Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata6 Jaipur3 Hyderabad2 Bangalore2 Chandigarh1 Chennai1 Jodhpur1 Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 695 Section 113 Section 153A3 Section 143(3)3 Section 12A2 Section 1322 Section 143(2)2 Section 44A2

PRAKASH PRAVEEN KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 636/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Sri Balram R Rao, A.RFor Respondent: Shri V. Parithivel, D.R

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 250Section 44ASection 69

purchase from M/s. Supreme International and therefore, it has nothing to do with the bogus/fictitious sales as alleged by the AO. Therefore, we find no merits on the addition made by AO amounting to Rs.60,56,515/- on the alleged ground of fictitious bills/invoices issued by the assessee without actual movement of goods or services. The revenue has also

PRAKASH PRAVEEN KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(3), BANGALORE

PRAKASH PRAVEEN KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(2)(3), BANGALORE

M/S. DEVARAJ URS EDUCATIONAL TRUST FOR BACKWARD CLASSES (REGD),KOLAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), BANGALORE