BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi207Mumbai92Calcutta65Chennai48Kolkata41Amritsar35Jaipur30Ahmedabad13Lucknow12Nagpur8Surat6Karnataka6Indore5SC4Raipur3Bangalore3Telangana2Cuttack2Chandigarh2Gauhati1Hyderabad1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 683Disallowance2Survey u/s 133A2Addition to Income2

SRI. K. SATISH KUMAR,BENGALURU vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-9, BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 1988/BANG/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Aug 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, D.R
Section 133A(1)Section 143(3)Section 234Section 234A

bogus expenditure on the basis of DVO report obtained by AO u/s 142A of the Act. 5.2.1 This issue was originally came for consideration in the assessment year 2006-07 before this Tribunal in ITA No.444/Bang/2009 vide order dated 17.7.2009 made an observation as follows:- “2. The first grievance of the appellant is against the addition of Rs.7

M/S. CANARA BANK ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 989/BANG/2023[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Mar 2024AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 1996-97 M/S. Canara Bank, Vs. Dcit, Fm Wing, Head Office, 112, J C Road, Circle – 2(1)(1), Bengaluru – 560 002. Bengaluru. Pan : Aaajs 1557 Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. S. Ananthan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 07.03.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 08.03.2024

For Appellant: Shri. S. Ananthan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Subramanian S, Addl. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 250

purchase of the leased assets and the existence of the same. Therefore, CIT(A) directed the AO to grant the depreciation on the leased assets. On further appeal by the Revenue, the Tribunal restored the matter to the AO. The relevant finding of the Tribunal reads as follows: “15. The difference between this case and those dealt in paras

BHARATH HI-TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD.,BANGALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1035/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Apr 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: \nShri Inder Paul Bansal &
Section 68

purchasing of asset. In\nresponse to the above query of the AO, the assessee\nsubmitted reply on 09/12/2019. The submission of the\nassessee was examined and accepted except unsecured\nloan. The AO further asked the assessee to furnish the\ndetails of loan received during the year, amount if\ninterest paid along with the return of income of the\nlender