SRI. K. SATISH KUMAR,BENGALURU vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-9, BANGALORE
In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed
ITA 1988/BANG/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore01 Aug 2022AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, D.R
Section 133A(1)Section 143(3)Section 234Section 234A
bogus expenditure on the basis of DVO report obtained by AO u/s 142A of the Act.
5.2.1 This issue was originally came for consideration in the assessment year
2006-07
before this Tribunal in ITA
No.444/Bang/2009 vide order dated 17.7.2009 made an observation as follows:-
“2. The first grievance of the appellant is against the addition of Rs.7
