DINESH KUMAR SINGHI,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, BANGALORE
In the result, the assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2011-12 is partly allowed
ITA 699/BANG/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Apr 2018AY 2005-06
Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boaz
For Appellant: Shri K.R. Pradeep, C.AFor Respondent: Shri K.V. Arvind, Standing Counsel for Dept
Section 10BSection 132Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 154
section 132(4) of the Act. No specific request for cross examination was made by the assessee.
xvi.
The quarterly and annual performance report submitted to SEZ the assessee declared that the unit has commenced production from the EOU only since 30/5/2006. From the about is clear that EOU was not established till 30/5/2006 and not entitled for deduction under
