BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

182 results for “TDS”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai625Delhi462Chennai263Bangalore182Kolkata150Hyderabad136Jaipur115Ahmedabad97Cochin62Surat47Raipur42Indore41Chandigarh40Nagpur25Rajkot25Lucknow25Pune24Visakhapatnam20Agra18Amritsar14Guwahati14Patna10Cuttack9Jodhpur9Varanasi9Allahabad4Dehradun4Ranchi3Telangana3Jabalpur2Karnataka2Punjab & Haryana1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A105Addition to Income78Section 14877Section 13260Section 6848Section 153C43Section 14734Section 143(3)28Section 132(4)25TDS

M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LIMITED,MANGALORE vs. ACIT, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 774/BANG/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

Showing 1–20 of 182 · Page 1 of 10

...
24
Survey u/s 133A22
Undisclosed Income21

M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LIMITED,MANGALORE vs. ACIT, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 773/BANG/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

DCIT, MANGALORE vs. M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LTD, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 818/BANG/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LIMITED,MANGALORE vs. ACIT, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 776/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

DCIT, MANGALORE vs. M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LTD, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 819/BANG/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

M/S DELTA INFRALOGISTICS WORLDWIDE LIMITED,MANGALORE vs. ACIT, MANGALORE

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2008-

ITA 772/BANG/2012[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 May 2019AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazappeal Nos. & Appellant Respondent Assessment Years

For Appellant: Shri. V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. K. V. Aravind, Advocate
Section 132Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153ASection 40

Unexplained Expenditure Ground No.6 (Revenue’s appeals for Assessment Year 2007-08 13.1 In these grounds (supra), Revenue assails the impugned orders of the CIT(A) in deleting the disallowance of Rs.1,66,02,075/- and Rs.59,67,500/- that was made as unexplained expenditure based on seized material A/HML/18 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06 respectively

SRI. E. KRISHNA MURTHY (HUF) vs. DCIT,

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 982/BANG/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. MANOHAR (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1024/BANG/2012[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. THRIVIKRAMA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1029/BANG/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. VIDYARANYA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1034/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. KRISHNA MURTHY vs. DCIT,

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 974/BANG/2012[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

DCIT, MANGALORE vs. E RAMESH UPADHYAYA HUF, DAKSHINA KANNADA

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 992/BANG/2012[2004 - 05]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

DCIT, MANGALORE vs. E RAMESH UPADHYAYA HUF, DAKSHINA KANNADA

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 996/BANG/2012[2008 - 09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. THRIVIKRAMA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1028/BANG/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. MANOHAR (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1025/BANG/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. VIDYARANYA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1033/BANG/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

DCIT, MANGALORE vs. E RAMESH UPADHYAYA HUF, DAKSHINA KANNADA

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 987/BANG/2012[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 1999-2000

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. KRISHNA MURTHY vs. DCIT,

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 979/BANG/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. THRIVIKRAMA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1030/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved

SRI. E. VIDYARANYA (HUF),DAKSHINA KANNADA vs. DCIT, MANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in the case of Ramesh Upadhyay in ITA Nos

ITA 1032/BANG/2012[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Nov 2018AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 132

TDS, he made the deposits in smaller denominations of amount of Rs.15,000/- each. During the course of assessment proceedings, statement of Shri. E. Krishna Murthy on behalf of all the searched persons were recorded. It was stated that the deposits were made by the bigger HUF i.e., Shri. Ramesh Upadhyay, HUF and later on the bigger HUF was dissolved