Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12 Jaipur7 Chandigarh6 Bangalore5 Kolkata5 Pune2 Visakhapatnam2 Chennai1 Karnataka1 Ranchi1 Varanasi1 Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 807 Addition to Income5 Section 14A4 Section 143(2)3 Section 80C2 Section 92C2 Section 143(3)2 Section 234A2 Section 692 Deduction

PRASHANTH PARAMAHANS MANIK ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1716/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Dept

Section 11Section 127Section 143(2)Section 234BSection 69Section 80C

80D of the Act. The return of income filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice under section 143(2) of the Act dated 16th August 2018 was issued by the office of the assistant commissioner of income tax circle-1 Thane Maharashtra. 5. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was transferred to AO ward

PRASHANTH PARAMAHANS MANIK ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BENGALURU

PRASHANTH PARAMAHANS MANIK ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BENGALURU

M/S MANIPAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,UDUPI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, UDUPI

AJITH M KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

TOYOTA BOSHOKU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BIDADI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OR THE DCIT, CIRCLE - 7(1)(1), KORAMANGALA

ARIBA TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU