BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai27Jaipur17Delhi17Cochin11Bangalore11Lucknow10Kolkata10Pune6Chandigarh6Raipur6Ahmedabad6Chennai5Hyderabad4Amritsar3Visakhapatnam2Nagpur1Indore1Cuttack1Rajkot1Varanasi1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 80I26Section 807Addition to Income7Section 40a6Deduction6Section 1445Section 143(2)5TDS5Section 80C4Section 69A

KANTILAL JAIN,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 579/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri B.R. Sudheendra, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R. Ghale, Standing Counsel
Section 143(1)Section 194DSection 234BSection 234CSection 250

TDS return of the deductor can be matched automatically with the return of income filed by the assessee. The person who is paying a sum to a resident under a life insurance policy is aware of the amount of insurance premium paid by the assessee. Hence, it is proposed to provide for tax deduction at source at the rate

4
Section 194D4
Cash Deposit2

SRI. BEVAHALLI GANGAPPA RAMAKRISHNAPPA,,KOLAR vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 732/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Nishal B., D.R
Section 115BSection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 234Section 250Section 44ASection 69A

80C, 80TTA and 80G deduction of Rs, 1,62,710/- . The AO added Rs.2,00,46,877/- being cash deposits made during the entire financial year in to two Axis Bank accounts held in the names of Deccan Hospital and Deccan Pharma as income under section 69A. Further Rs. 26,61,208/- being other non-cash credits in these

MR.MOHD RAFIQ,GULBARGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, GULBARGA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 573/BANG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri A. K. Garodiaassessment Year : 2010-11 Mr. Mohd. Rafiq, Income Tax Officer, Pro: Karnataka Transport Co. Ward - 2 & Acc Contractor, Near Irani Vs. Gulbarga. Building, Accc Main Road, At/Post Wadi, Tq. Chittapur, Dist. Gulbarga – 585 225. Pan : Adspr 0153 Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Pranav Krishna, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Manjeet Singh, Addl. Cit (Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru Date Of Hearing : 10.02.2020 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.02.2020 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Pranav Krishna, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Manjeet Singh, Addl. CIT (DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 139Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 201(1)Section 40Section 40a

TDS. He submitted that in the interest of justice, the matter be restored back to the file of AO and if it is done, the assessee will obtain and furnish the required certificates from the payees. He also submitted that this proviso is held to be retrospective by several judicial pronouncements. Learned DR of the Revenue supported the order

DCIT, BANGALORE vs. M/S NSL SUGARS LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the revenue in ITA No

ITA 37/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Nov 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N V Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodiaassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri B.S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri C.H. Sundar Rao, CIT(DR-I), ITAT, Bangalore
Section 70Section 72Section 80A(1)Section 80CSection 80I

80C to 80U shall be allowed from the gross total income of the assessee. Hence, Chapter VIA deductions are allowed only after set off of losses including inter unit losses. Further as per the provisions of section 72 of the IT Act, the brought forward losses have to be adjusted against the gross total income of the assessee before arriving

M/S NSL SUGARS LTD ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5(1)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal by the revenue in ITA No

ITA 1228/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N V Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodiaassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri B.S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri C.H. Sundar Rao, CIT(DR-I), ITAT, Bangalore
Section 70Section 72Section 80A(1)Section 80CSection 80I

80C to 80U shall be allowed from the gross total income of the assessee. Hence, Chapter VIA deductions are allowed only after set off of losses including inter unit losses. Further as per the provisions of section 72 of the IT Act, the brought forward losses have to be adjusted against the gross total income of the assessee before arriving

PRASHANTH PARAMAHANS MANIK ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(3), BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby partly allowed

ITA 1716/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmedassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ganesh R Gale, Standing Counsel for Dept
Section 11Section 127Section 143(2)Section 234BSection 69Section 80C

80C and 80D of the Act. The return of income filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notice under section 143(2) of the Act dated 16th August 2018 was issued by the office of the assistant commissioner of income tax circle-1 Thane Maharashtra. 5. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was transferred

M/S. ODION BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) - WARD - 2(3), BANGALORE

In the result, the assessee's appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 807/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri G. N. Bhatt, C.AFor Respondent: Dr. S. Palani Kumar, Addl. CIT (D.R)
Section 133ASection 194ISection 194LSection 201(1)

TDS on payments and raised demand under Section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act on non-compliance of provisions of Section 194LA and determined total demand payable of Rs.91,487. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(Appeals). The CIT(Appeals) before going into merits of the case found that there

AJITH M KUMAR,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(3)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, Appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2389/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Vice – & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Ms. Susan Mathew, CAFor Respondent: Standing Counsel for Revenue
Section 133(6)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 15Section 80Section 80ASection 80C

TDS was granted. 3. The Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein he filed a detailed written statement stating that due to the death of his father and ill health of his mother, assessee could not file return of income. The Assessee submitted that his salary income is Rs. 32,45,753/- after considering the HRA exemption

TOYOTA BOSHOKU AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,BIDADI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT OR THE DCIT, CIRCLE - 7(1)(1), KORAMANGALA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1539/BANG/2024[AY 2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 May 2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri K.R Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)
Section 234ASection 270A

80C, 80D, etc.) exceeds the permissible limit. 5. Mismatch in Income & Form 26AS/TDS Details - Any inconsistency between the income reported and the details in Form 26AS, AIS, or TDS certificates may be adjusted. 6. Disallowance of Exempt Income - If any income claimed as exempt does not meet the required conditions. 7. Mismatch in Tax Payments - Adjustments for advance tax, TDS

ARIBA TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1587/BANG/2024[AY 2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Mr. Aliasgar Rampurawala, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Nandini Das, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 92C

80C, 80D, etc.) exceeds the permissible limit. 5. Mismatch in Income & Form 26AS/TDS Details – Any inconsistency between the income reported and the details in Form 26AS, AIS, or TDS certificates may be adjusted. 6. Disallowance of Exempt Income – If any income claimed as exempt does not meet the required conditions. . IT(TP)A No.1587/Bang/2024 Page 15 of 19 7. Mismatch

ABHINANDAN SHANTHINATH SALIGRAMA ,MYSORE vs. DCIT-1(1) & TPS, MYSORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 2209/BANG/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Mar 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubeyassessment Year : 2023-24

For Appellant: Sri Narendra Sharma, A.RFor Respondent: Sri Ganesh R Ghale, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 139(1)Section 140BSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

TDS credit of Rs.5,59,370/- & claimed the same to be updated return as per the provisions contained in section 139(8A) of the Act. We also observed that the assessee in his so called updated return had withdrawn the claim of HRA and LTC and corrected the false deduction claimed from salary amounting to Rs.4,34,400/-. Further