BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,664 results for “TDS”+ Section 7clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,592Mumbai5,567Bangalore2,664Chennai2,223Kolkata1,521Pune1,116Ahmedabad1,019Hyderabad795Indore710Cochin704Jaipur557Patna554Raipur452Chandigarh387Nagpur365Karnataka364Surat302Visakhapatnam255Rajkot226Cuttack209Lucknow196Amritsar140Dehradun122Jodhpur110Jabalpur71Agra70Ranchi70Guwahati65Panaji65Allahabad64Telangana59Kerala33SC25Varanasi23Calcutta16Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana4J&K3Uttarakhand3Orissa3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Addition to Income55Section 143(3)52TDS44Deduction42Transfer Pricing37Section 10A35Disallowance35Section 20131Section 201(1)31Section 263

SOUTH INDIA FREIGHT CARRIERS ,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2)(4), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2586/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Nov 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Years : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Sudheendra B.R, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Addl. CIT
Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 40Section 44A

TDS. Page 11 of 20 11. We have noticed earlier that the expression “goods carriage” used in sec.194C(6) shall have meaning as defined in sub-section (7

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-2(1), DAVANGERE vs. M/S MUURUGARAJENDRA OIL INDUSTRY PVT LTD , CHITRADURGA

Showing 1–20 of 2,664 · Page 1 of 134

...
27
Section 4026
Section 153C22

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2094/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore26 Apr 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P. Boazassessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CITFor Respondent: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate
Section 194(6)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

TDS, filing of PAN of the Payee-Transporter alone is sufficient and no confirmation letter as required by the learned CIT is required. 26. On the aspect of observation of the learned CIT that Sections 194C(6) and Section 194C(7

BANGALORE TRUF CLUB LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), BENGALURU

In the result appeal filed by assessee for assessment year 2012-

ITA 1848/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore18 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Padamchand Khincha, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 194BSection 201fSection 234BSection 234CSection 40

7. Thereafter, the learned representative for the assessee explained why the provisions of Section 194B of the Act are not applicable. It was pointed out that when Section 194B of the Act was amended in 2001 to insert the words 'card game or other game of any sort', the intention was to cover TV shows and quiz shows. Correspondingly, another

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BANGALORE vs. M/S. BANGALORE TURF CLUB LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed and appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2248/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2013-14

For Respondent: Shri Padamchand Khincha
Section 194BSection 201fSection 37Section 37(1)Section 40

7. Interest levied under sections 234B. 7.1. The learned AO has erred in levying interest under section 234B of the Act. On facts and circumstances of the case and law applicable, interest under section 234B is not leviable. The appellant denies its liability to pay interest under section 234B. 8. Prayer 8.1. In view of the above and other grounds

BANGALORE TURF CLUB LIMITED,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1)(2), BENGALURU

In the result, appeal filed by assessee stands partly allowed and appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1849/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2013-14

For Respondent: Shri Padamchand Khincha
Section 194BSection 201fSection 37Section 37(1)Section 40

7. Interest levied under sections 234B. 7.1. The learned AO has erred in levying interest under section 234B of the Act. On facts and circumstances of the case and law applicable, interest under section 234B is not leviable. The appellant denies its liability to pay interest under section 234B. 8. Prayer 8.1. In view of the above and other grounds

M/S. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,SHIVAMOGGA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

ITA 882/BANG/2023[26Q/Quarter-4/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri George George Kshri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Pai, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Nischal B, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 250

TDS. Basavanagudi, Shivamogga. TAN : BLRC 03390 C APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Hemant Pai, C.A Revenue by : Shri Nischal B, Addl. CIT (DR) Date of hearing : 04.01.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 09.01.2024 O R D E R PER BENCH All these appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate orders passed by the CIT(A), which is as under

M/S.METROPOLITAN MEDIA COMPANY LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, HUBLI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1679/BANG/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri S. Sundar Raman, CA(Written submissions)For Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT (D.R)
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 194CSection 40

7 8 9 We found the co-ordinate Bench of tribunal in ITA No.183/Bang/2014 Dt.27.05.2016 in ITO (TDS) Vs. Confident Projects (India) Ltd. has considered the Circular No.5 of 2016 of CBDT and observed on non-applicability of 10 provisions of Section

SHIVABASAPPA KARIYAPPANAVAR ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3)(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1537/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2024AY 2017-18
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 250

TDS amounting to Rs. 8,66,071/- not given while passing\nintimation U/s 143(1) of the Act.\n4.\nAggrieved by the order of the AO passed u/s. 154 of the Act dated\n27/09/2019, the assessee has preferred an appeal before the\nLd.CIT(A)/NFAC.\n5.\nThe ld. ADDL/JCIT(A)-1, Chandigarh dismissed the appeal of the\nassessee

INFOSYS LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ADDL.C.I.T, BANGALORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for A

ITA 102/BANG/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore10 Nov 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Yadav & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri H.N. Khincha, C.AFor Respondent: Shri R. N. Parbat, CIT-III (D.R)
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 92ASection 92C

7 IT(TP)A Nos.102 & 233/Bang/2013 Infosys Limited Rs.2,15,26,941 paid to Forrester Research Inc., USA for non-deduction of tax thereon under Section 195 of the Act. 6.2.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record, including the judicial pronouncements cited. We find that the co-ordinate bench of this

M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 6(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1092/BANG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

7 Act. Interest under Ground No. Section 234C of the - - - 8 Act. 3. The Ld.AR submitted that pursuant to the MAP entered into between the competent authorities of India and Korea with respect to the transfer pricing adjustment made in the hands of assessee, the transfer pricing issues contested in the respective grounds for the years under consideration as tabulated

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SPECIAL RANGE-6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA-BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 958/BANG/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

7 Act. Interest under Ground No. Section 234C of the - - - 8 Act. 3. The Ld.AR submitted that pursuant to the MAP entered into between the competent authorities of India and Korea with respect to the transfer pricing adjustment made in the hands of assessee, the transfer pricing issues contested in the respective grounds for the years under consideration as tabulated

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SPECIAL RANGE - 6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R &D INSTITUTE INDIA- BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1046/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

7 Act. Interest under Ground No. Section 234C of the - - - 8 Act. 3. The Ld.AR submitted that pursuant to the MAP entered into between the competent authorities of India and Korea with respect to the transfer pricing adjustment made in the hands of assessee, the transfer pricing issues contested in the respective grounds for the years under consideration as tabulated

M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME- TAX, CIRCLE - 6(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 1166/BANG/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

7 Act. Interest under Ground No. Section 234C of the - - - 8 Act. 3. The Ld.AR submitted that pursuant to the MAP entered into between the competent authorities of India and Korea with respect to the transfer pricing adjustment made in the hands of assessee, the transfer pricing issues contested in the respective grounds for the years under consideration as tabulated

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX, SPECIAL RANGE - 6, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SAMSUNG R & D INSTITUTE INDIA-BANGALORE PRIVATE LIMITED, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee as per revised grounds stands allowed and the appeals filed by the revenue stands dismissed for the years under consideration

ITA 978/BANG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt Beena Pillai & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee RajkumarFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 32Section 40

7 Act. Interest under Ground No. Section 234C of the - - - 8 Act. 3. The Ld.AR submitted that pursuant to the MAP entered into between the competent authorities of India and Korea with respect to the transfer pricing adjustment made in the hands of assessee, the transfer pricing issues contested in the respective grounds for the years under consideration as tabulated

M/S DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTPU , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2846/BANG/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore07 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C(3)

7. The ld. D.R. relied on the order of ld. DRP. 8. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. We are of the opinion that this comparable has been considered by the coordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of NXP India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT cited (supra), wherein held as under

THE RADDI SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA,DHARWAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HUBBALLI

In the result, the impugned order could not be faulted with

ITA 538/BANG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Parthasarthi and Smt. Sheetal, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 40A

TDS under section 194A. 3. A question has also been raised as to whether normal members, associate members and sympathizer members are also covered by the exemption under section 194A(3)(v). It is hereby clarified that the exemption is available only to such members who have joined in application for the registration of the cooperative society and those

DELL INDIA P LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS), LTU, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1644/BANG/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

7 ITA Nos. 1644/Bang/2014, 1151/Bang/2015 & 2035/Bang/2016 loss of revenue, levy of the same where revenue is compensated through Section 40(a)(i)/(ia) disallowance, is not warranted. Notwithstanding the above, the Learned AO has erred in calculating interest under Section 201(1A) as Rs. 4,436,352 instead of Rs. 4,380,879. Interest levied under section

DELL INTERNATIONAL SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,,BANGALORE vs. ITO, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 1151/BANG/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

7 ITA Nos. 1644/Bang/2014, 1151/Bang/2015 & 2035/Bang/2016 loss of revenue, levy of the same where revenue is compensated through Section 40(a)(i)/(ia) disallowance, is not warranted. Notwithstanding the above, the Learned AO has erred in calculating interest under Section 201(1A) as Rs. 4,436,352 instead of Rs. 4,380,879. Interest levied under section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, BANGALORE vs. M/S.DELL INDIA PVT.LTD.,, BANGALORE

In the result the appeals filed by assessee and revenue for A

ITA 2035/BANG/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

Section 201

7 ITA Nos. 1644/Bang/2014, 1151/Bang/2015 & 2035/Bang/2016 loss of revenue, levy of the same where revenue is compensated through Section 40(a)(i)/(ia) disallowance, is not warranted. Notwithstanding the above, the Learned AO has erred in calculating interest under Section 201(1A) as Rs. 4,436,352 instead of Rs. 4,380,879. Interest levied under section

ROBERT BOSCH ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) /OSD , BANGALORE

In the result, both the appeals filed by assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1689/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore31 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Padiwala, Sr
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 40

section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. 6. In support he placed reliance on following decisions:  Decision of Hon’ble Tribunal in case of Pfizer Ltd vs.ITO(TDS)(OSD) reported in (2012) 28 taxmann.com 17;  Decision of Hon’ble Tribunal in case of IDBI v. ITO reported in (2007) 107 ITD 45; 7