M/S, SUBEX LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE- 6(1)(2), BANGALORE
In the result, the appeal by the revenue is dismissed while the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 2249/BANG/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Feb 2020AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri N.V.Vasudevan & Shri B.R.Baskaranita No.2249(Bang)/2019 (Assessment Year : 2007-08) M/S Subex Limited, Rmz Ecoworld, Outer Ring Road, Devarabisanahlli, Bangalore-560 103 Panno.Aabcs9255R Appellant Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-6(1)(2), Bangalore Respondent & Ita No.2361(B)/2019 (Assessment Year : 2007-08) (By Revenue) Appellant By : Shri Aditya Raipuria, Ca Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Kumar, Cit
For Appellant: Shri Aditya Raipuria, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Kumar, CIT
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 154Section 35D
35D as well.
“6. We have heard the rival submissions. It is noticed from the order of CIT(Appeals) that in assessee's own case for AY 2010-11, the Tribunal has held that disallowance of business service-marketing charges will go to increase the profits of the business which is eligible for deduction u/s. 10AA