BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

119 results for “TDS”+ Section 275clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi385Mumbai291Bangalore119Karnataka84Chandigarh82Chennai79Raipur77Hyderabad63Cochin62Kolkata48Ahmedabad41Jaipur35Indore14Surat12Nagpur8Rajkot8Cuttack8Pune7Ranchi4Lucknow4Calcutta2Amritsar2Guwahati2Jodhpur2Visakhapatnam1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)184Section 201124Section 192120Section 10120TDS70Section 133A62Survey u/s 133A62Section 15430Addition to Income21Section 271(1)(c)

PRIYADARSHINI EDUCATION SOCIETY ,DAVANGERE vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , HUBBALI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2013-14 are allowed

ITA 2446/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT
Section 133ASection 192Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273BSection 275

275(1)(c) of the Act, are the orders under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act dated 22.03.2013 for Assessment Year 2011-12 to 2012-13 and we find that action for penalty was contemplated therein by the AO against the assessee under section 271C of the Act. That a show cause notice was only issued

Showing 1–20 of 119 · Page 1 of 6

18
Section 25016
Limitation/Time-bar14

PRIYADARSHINI EDUCATION SOCIETY ,DAVANGERE vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , HUBLI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2013-14 are allowed

ITA 2447/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT
Section 133ASection 192Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273BSection 275

275(1)(c) of the Act, are the orders under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act dated 22.03.2013 for Assessment Year 2011-12 to 2012-13 and we find that action for penalty was contemplated therein by the AO against the assessee under section 271C of the Act. That a show cause notice was only issued

PRIYADARSHINI EDUCATION SOCIETY ,DAVANGERE vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , HUBLI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals for Assessment Years 2011-12 to 2013-14 are allowed

ITA 2448/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Shri. Zain Ahmed Khan, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Vikas Suryavamshi, Addl.CIT
Section 133ASection 192Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273BSection 275

275(1)(c) of the Act, are the orders under section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act dated 22.03.2013 for Assessment Year 2011-12 to 2012-13 and we find that action for penalty was contemplated therein by the AO against the assessee under section 271C of the Act. That a show cause notice was only issued

M/S. SRI. MUTHU CINE SERVICE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1632/BANG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Jan 2025AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)

275 (w.e.f. 1.4.1971).]\n[(1)] [Inserted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 115 (w.e.f. 1.4.1989).] No order imposing a\npenalty under this Chapter shall be passed-\n[ (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an\nappeal to the [* * *] [Substituted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 116, for Clauses

M/S. SRI. MUTHU CINE SERVICE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1631/BANG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Sri B. S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri V. Parithivel, JCIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153CSection 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(c)

275(1)(c) of the Act is applicable in the present case. Since all these penalty orders for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2018-19 were passed only after 6 months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty initiated as depicted in tabular form above, we accordingly held that penalty orders

M/S. SRI. MUTHU CINE SERVICE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1630/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Sri B. S. Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri V. Parithivel, JCIT
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139Section 153CSection 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)Section 275(1)(c)

275(1)(c) of the Act is applicable in the present case. Since all these penalty orders for the assessment years 2014-15 to 2018-19 were passed only after 6 months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty initiated as depicted in tabular form above, we accordingly held that penalty orders

M/S. SRI. MUTHU CINE SERVICE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BANGALORE

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1629/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Jan 2025AY 2014-15
Section 132Section 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)

275 (w.e.f. 1.4.1971).]\n[(1)] [Inserted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 115 (w.e.f. 1.4.1989).] No order imposing a\npenalty under this Chapter shall be passed-\n[ (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an\nappeal to the [* * *] [Substituted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 116, for Clauses

M/S. SRI. MUTHU CINE SERVICE,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), BENGALURU

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 1654/BANG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Section 132Section 250Section 270ASection 271(1)(c)

275 (w.e.f. 1.4.1971).]\n[(1)] [Inserted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 115 (w.e.f. 1.4.1989).] No order imposing a\npenalty under this Chapter shall be passed-\n[ (a) in a case where the relevant assessment or other order is the subject-matter of an\nappeal to the [* * *] [Substituted by Act 4 of 1988, Section 116, for Clauses

M/S SHA THANMAL SUKHARAJJI & CO,RANEBENNUR vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , HUBBALI

In the result, appeals by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1726/BANG/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodia

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Narayana, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT) Bengaluru
Section 115Section 133ASection 194Section 194BSection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271Section 271CSection 271C(2)

TDS). The decision of the Hon’ble ITA Nos. 1724 to 1726/Bang/2018 Page 8 of 14 Supreme Court in case of Hissaria Brothers is in context of applicability of clause (c) to sub-section (1) to section 275

M/S SHA THANMAL SUKHARAJJI & CO,RANEBENNURU vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , RANEBENNURU

In the result, appeals by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1724/BANG/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodia

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Narayana, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT) Bengaluru
Section 115Section 133ASection 194Section 194BSection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271Section 271CSection 271C(2)

TDS). The decision of the Hon’ble ITA Nos. 1724 to 1726/Bang/2018 Page 8 of 14 Supreme Court in case of Hissaria Brothers is in context of applicability of clause (c) to sub-section (1) to section 275

M/S SHA THANMAL SUKHARAJJI & CO,RANEBENNURU vs. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS RANGE , HUBLI

In the result, appeals by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1725/BANG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri A K Garodia

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Narayana, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT) Bengaluru
Section 115Section 133ASection 194Section 194BSection 194CSection 201Section 201(1)Section 271Section 271CSection 271C(2)

TDS). The decision of the Hon’ble ITA Nos. 1724 to 1726/Bang/2018 Page 8 of 14 Supreme Court in case of Hissaria Brothers is in context of applicability of clause (c) to sub-section (1) to section 275

DIVYA DINESH ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2195/BANG/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2026AY 2021-22
Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80G

275/-\nTotal (A+B+C+D)\nRs. 68,81,000/-\n4.2 Further, the assessee against the taxable income at normal slab\nrate of Rs. 68,81,000/- claimed deduction under section 80G of the Act\nfor Rs. 68,81,000/- only. Hence, the assessee declared total income of\nRs. 36,78,25,370/- being taxable at special rate only.\n4.3

DIVYA DINESH ,BENGALURU vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-7(1)(1), BANGALORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2194/BANG/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Feb 2026AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Shri Sudheendra B.R, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Balusamy N, JCIT
Section 115BSection 143(1)Section 154Section 250Section 80G

275/- Total (A+B+C+D) Rs. 68,81,000/- 4.2 Further, the assessee against the taxable income at normal slab rate of Rs. 68,81,000/- claimed deduction under section 80G of the Act . ITA No.2194 & 2195/Bang/2025 Page 3 of 16 for Rs. 68,81,000/- only. Hence, the assessee declared total income

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 512/BANG/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 514/BANG/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSRANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 515/BANG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 516/BANG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 511/BANG/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 518/BANG/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible

M/S. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,THIRTHAHALLI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) WARD, DAVANGERE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed for assessment years 2011-12 to 2014-15 on the legal issue and the appeals for assessment years 2015-

ITA 510/BANG/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Jan 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.R Baskaran & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Chytanya KK, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. R Premi, JCIT (DR)
Section 10Section 133ASection 192Section 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1A) of the Act, by Ld.AO, branch wise, qua assessment year, in paper book at page 3-6 as under: Page 5 of 74 ITA No.507 to 566 /Bang/2020 Theerthahalli Branch Payment to Cash Medical Payment to Chinnu Kulkarni Services Benefit u/s 192 Graphics 194C u s 194C Interest Interest Interest TDS 201 201 201 TDS TDS deductible