BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 243Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi31Chennai23Dehradun8Hyderabad6Cochin4Mumbai4Guwahati4Bangalore3Indore3Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 234E17Section 200A12Section 2008Section 1566Section 206C4TDS3Section 2502Section 32Section 234E(3)2Deduction

CICILIA PINTO,MANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 621/BANG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Smt. Vanaja, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Basaganni, D.R
Section 156Section 200Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234ESection 234E(3)Section 243E(3)Section 250Section 3
2
Penalty2

243E(3):"The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (I) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with subsection (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C" 5. Therefore, once the TDS

CICILIA PINTO,MANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 622/BANG/2021[2014-15(26Q-Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 May 2022

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2013-14

For Appellant: Smt. Vanaja, A.RFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Basaganni, D.R
Section 156Section 200Section 200ASection 201Section 206CSection 234ESection 234E(3)Section 243E(3)Section 250Section 3

243E(3):"The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (I) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with subsection (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C" 5. Therefore, once the TDS

RED ROOSTER PERFORMANCE (INTERNATIONAL) PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 536/BANG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore05 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahured Rooster Performance Vs The Income Tax Officer (International) Pvt. Ltd. Ward 3(1), Tds B-10, Ngef Industrial Estate Hmt Building, Bellary Road Whitefield Road Bangalore 560032 Mahadevapura Post Bangalore 560048 Pan – Aaecr1751N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Mrs. Sunaina, Ca Respondent By: Shri K.R. Narayana, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 02/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 05/08/2022 O R D E R Per: L.P. Sahu, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1042909630(1) Of The Learned Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi In Appeal Dated 29.04.2022 For Ay 2014-15. 2. The Solitary Substantial Issue Raised By The Assessee Challenges Levying Of Late Fee Under Section 234E Of The Income Tax Act (The Act) For The Delay In Remittance Of Tds. 3. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is Engaged In The Business Of Designing, Modification, Manufacture, Trading Of Prototype

For Appellant: Mrs. Sunaina, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.R. Narayana, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 154(1)(c)Section 156Section 200ASection 220(1)Section 220(2)Section 234ESection 271H(1)(a)

TDS 3 Red Rooster Performance (International) Pvt. Ltd. deducted prior to 01.06.2015. Therefore the demand made under Section 200A r.w.s. 243E