BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 206Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai84Karnataka26Kolkata15Bangalore8Mumbai8Delhi4Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 234E37Section 271H32Section 200A19Section 206C8TDS8Section 201(1)5Section 206A5Condonation of Delay5Section 271(1)(a)4Section 24Penalty4Addition to Income4

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 533/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] ITA Nos.533 to 536/Bang/2025 Page 5 of 8 he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 534/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] ITA Nos.533 to 536/Bang/2025 Page 5 of 8 he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 535/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] ITA Nos.533 to 536/Bang/2025 Page 5 of 8 he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)& TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 536/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q 3]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] ITA Nos.533 to 536/Bang/2025 Page 5 of 8 he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure

KOOUD SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/BANG/2022[2013-14 (24Q-QII)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Tyagi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh D, JCIT(DR)
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234Section 234E

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues: Provided that the amount of penalty

M/S. NARAYANA MINES PRIVATE LIMITED,HOSAPETE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCLE, BANGALORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore12 Oct 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri B.S Balachandran, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Baseganni, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 133ASection 206ASection 206CSection 206C(7)

TDS) discussed the provision of section 206A (1A) and he noted that the assessee had not obtained prescribed Form 27C from

M/S MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS PVT LTD ,BANGALORE vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) CIRCLE-1(2), BANGALORE

In the result, the revenue’s appeal is dismissed and the assessee appeal is

ITA 130/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore24 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.K. Garodia & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleit(It)A No.130/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/S. Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt. Ltd., Mantri House, 41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore-560001 ….Appellant Pan Aafcm 1653D Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, (International Transaction), Circle 1(2), Bangalore. ……Respondent. It(It)A No.384/Bang/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) (By Revenue) Assessee By: Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate. Revenue By: Shri H. Anand, Addl. Cit (D.R)

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri H. Anand, Addl. CIT (D.R)
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 206ASection 250Section 9(1)(vii)Section 90(2)

TDS—Rate of deduction—Beneficial provision of DTAA—Assessee in normal course of its business remitted payments to Company D which was a non-resident company, located in Singapore—Company D was not tax assessee in India—Tax relationship between two countries was regulated in terms of Indo- Singapore DTAA—Revenue held that having regard to section 206A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), CIRCLE- 2(1), BANGALORE vs. M/S. SPECIAL LAND AND ACQUISITION OFFICER (METRO). KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, BANGALORE

In the result appeal filed by revenue stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 8/BANG/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt Beena Pillaiassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Special Land & Acquisition Officer (Metro), The Deputy Karnataka Industrial Commissioner Of Areas Development Board, Income-Tax (Tds), 14/3, 2Nd Floor, Circle – 2 (1), Vs. R.P. Bhavan, Nruptunga Bangalore. Road, Bangalore – 560 001. Pan: Aaatk1305J (Appellant) (Respondent) & C.O. No. 05/Bang/2021 (In Ita No. 8/Bang/2020) Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Special Land Acquisition Officer (Metro), The Deputy Karnataka Industrial Commissioner Of Areas Development Board, Income-Tax (Tds), 14/3, 2Nd Floor, R.P. Circle – 2 (1), Bhavan, Vs. Bangalore. Nruptunga Road, Bangalore – 560 001. Pan: Aaatk1305J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ashok Kulkarni, Advocate Shri Muzaffer Hussain, Cit Revenue By : (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 17.09.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 14.10.2021

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Kulkarni, AdvocateFor Respondent: (DR)
Section 13ASection 194LSection 201(1)Section 29

TDS etc. The Ld.AO noticed from the register that, 196 payees had not furnished their PAN to the assessee at the time of payment. Ld.AO accordingly called upon assessee, seeking explanation as to why the provisions of section 194 LA should not be invoked. The Ld. AO was of the view that as per section 206A