BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

394 results for “TDS”+ Section 200A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune651Chennai537Patna466Bangalore394Delhi339Mumbai163Cochin84Nagpur55Visakhapatnam49Dehradun43Kolkata35Hyderabad31Surat20Raipur20Jaipur13Indore13Lucknow13Cuttack12Panaji11Amritsar10Rajkot6Agra5Chandigarh4Jodhpur3Ahmedabad3Ranchi2Guwahati2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 234E337Section 200A176TDS100Section 20088Section 200(3)36Section 206C36Section 271H32Section 25030Deduction27Section 201

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1489/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

Showing 1–20 of 394 · Page 1 of 20

...
21
Condonation of Delay17
Limitation/Time-bar12

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1486/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1487/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL-TDS ,, UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1483/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL-TDS , UTTARA PRADESH

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1482/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1488/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1485/BANG/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-12(4), UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1484/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

DR C FERNANDES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY ,UTTARA KANNADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL TDS , UTTARA KANNADA

In the result, all nine appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 1490/BANG/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore17 Jan 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Ms. Pratiksha Pai, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 200ASection 234E

section 200A to levy any late fee u/s 234E prior to amendment of the law on 1-6-2015. Therefore, the demand of late fee would be automatically cancelled as the law prevailing at that time u/s 200A did not allow such levy while processing the TDS

VEENA SOMANI ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 2823/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200(1)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) of the Act while processing the TDS returns. It is the assessee’s contention that the legislature

VEENA SOMANI ,BANGALORE vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee for Assessment

ITA 2822/BANG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore04 Jun 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boaz

For Appellant: Smt. Suman Lunkar, CAFor Respondent: Dr. P. V. Pradeep Kumar, Addl. CIT
Section 154Section 200(1)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 234E

section 200A(1)(c) of the Act while processing the TDS returns. It is the assessee’s contention that the legislature

M/S. CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER,SHIVAMOGGA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD, DAVANGERE

The appeals are partly allowed to the aforesaid extent

ITA 882/BANG/2023[26Q/Quarter-4/2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore09 Jan 2024

Bench: Shri George George Kshri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Hemant Pai, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Nischal B, Addl. CIT (DR)
Section 250

1-6-2015, clauses (c) to (f) came to be substituted under section 200A providing that the fee under section 234E can be computed at the time of processing of the return and the intimation could be issued specifying the same payable by the deductor as fee under section 234E.[Para 12]. When the returns for TDS

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1)& TDS, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 536/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q 3]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 533/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD., ,BENGALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 534/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

ROOMAN TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1),, BANGALORE

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 535/BANG/2025[2015-16 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri. Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri. Soundararajan K

For Appellant: Shri. Vinod Gard, CAFor Respondent: Shri. R. Rajamanohar, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bangalore
Section 2Section 200ASection 234ESection 271(1)(a)Section 271H

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character or effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

KOOUD SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/BANG/2022[2013-14 (24Q-QII)]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Mar 2022

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Tyagi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh D, JCIT(DR)
Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234Section 234E

1) of Section 200A can be read as having prospective effect and not having retroactive character of effect. Resultantly, the demand under Section 200A for computation and intimation for the payment of fee under Section 234E could not be made in purported exercise of power under Section 200A by the respondent for the period of the respective assessment year prior

THOMAS ABRAHAM,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS),CIRCLE-1(3)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 388/BANG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Manohar Naidu, CA
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

Section 200A of the Act is a provision which deals with how a return of TDS filed u/s.200(3) of the Act has to be processed and it reads as follows:- “Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1

THOMAS ABRAHAM,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS),CIRCLE-1(3)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 387/BANG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Manohar Naidu, CA
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

Section 200A of the Act is a provision which deals with how a return of TDS filed u/s.200(3) of the Act has to be processed and it reads as follows:- “Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1

THOMAS ABRAHAM,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS),CIRCLE-1(3)(3), BANGALORE

In the result, all the four appeals filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 389/BANG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri N.V. Manohar Naidu, CA
Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 250

Section 200A of the Act is a provision which deals with how a return of TDS filed u/s.200(3) of the Act has to be processed and it reads as follows:- “Processing of statements of tax deducted at source. 200A. (1